PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Hoffman, Katherine L.
AU  - Schenck, Edward J.
AU  - Satlin, Michael J.
AU  - Whalen, William
AU  - Pan, Di
AU  - Williams, Nicholas
AU  - Díaz, Iván
TI  - Corticosteroids in COVID-19: Optimizing Observational Research through Target Trial Emulations
AID  - 10.1101/2022.05.27.22275037
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.05.27.22275037
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/07/2022.05.27.22275037.1.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/07/2022.05.27.22275037.1.full
AB  - Background Observational research provides a unique opportunity to learn causal effects when randomized trials are unavailable, but obtaining the correct estimates hinges on a multitude of design and analysis choices. We illustrate the advantages of modern causal inference methods and compare to standard research practice to estimate the effect of corticosteroids on mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in an observational dataset. We use several large RCTs to benchmark our results.Methods Our retrospective data consists of 3,298 COVID-19 patients hospitalized at New York-Presbyterian March 1-May 15, 2020. We design our study using the target trial framework. We estimate the effect of an intervention consisting of six days of corticosteroids administered at the time of severe hypoxia and contrast with an intervention consisting of no corticosteroids. The dataset includes dozens of time-varying confounders. We estimate the causal effects using a doubly robust estimator where the probabilities of treatment, outcome, and censoring are estimated using flexible regressions via super learning. We compare these analyses to standard practice in clinical research, consisting of two approaches: (i)Cox models for an exposure of corticosteroids receipt within various time windows of hypoxia, and (ii)Cox time-varying model where the exposure is daily administration of corticosteroids beginning at hospitalization.Results Our target trial emulation estimates corticosteroids to reduce 28-day mortality from 32% (95% confidence interval: 31-34) to 23% (21-24). This is qualitatively identical to the WHO’s RCT meta-analysis result. Hazard ratios from the Cox models range in size and direction from 0.50 (0.41-0.62) to 1.08 (0.80-1.47) and all study designs suffer from various forms of bias.Conclusion We demonstrate that clinical research based on observational data can unveil true causal relations. However, the correctness of these effect estimates requires designing and analyzing the data based on principles which are different from the current standard in clinical research. Widespread communication and adoption of these design and analytical techniques is of high importance for the improvement of clinical research.Competing Interest StatementDr. Edward Schenck is supported by NHLBI HL151876 and reports consulting for Axle Informatics regarding Coronavirus vaccine clinical trial through NIAID outside of the current work. Dr. Michael Satlin is supported by research grants from Allergan, Merck, BioFire Diagnostics, and SNIPRBiome and reports consulting payments from Shionogi outside of the current work.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Weill Cornell Medicine with a waiver of informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData produced in the present study are available in HIPAA compliant de-identified form upon reasonable request to the authors. https://github.com/kathoffman/steroids-trial-emulation