PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Johnson, Keith
AU  - Hammer, Steven J
AU  - Klymenko, Tanya
TI  - An Analysis of PCR Ct Scores and Distributions from the ONS Community Infection Survey during the COVID Second Wave in the UK
AID  - 10.1101/2022.06.03.22275903
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.06.03.22275903
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/04/2022.06.03.22275903.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/04/2022.06.03.22275903.full
AB  - This work presents an analysis of PCR cycle threshold (Ct) scores and their distributions, i.e. the probabilities that a test is positive with a score Ct, P(Ct), derived from the survey during the second COVID wave in the UK. Their relation to gene target breakdown is exemplified. Thus a significant parameter for tracking the course of COVID in the second wave is the percentage of positive tests with Ct < 25, %Ct <25, which is obtained by plotting weekly percentiles from the survey against Ct to construct the ogive or cumulative frequency curve (CMF). The biological basis for studying this parameter is the strong correlation between %Ct < 25 and the percentage of positive tests comprising target genes ORF1ab+N and ORF1ab+N+S, or %Inf.Furthermore, the probability distributions, obtained by differentiating the ogives, were found to be predominantly bimodal with a hot peak at Ct = 20.31+/- 4.65 and a cold peak with Ct = 32.95+/-1.11. These closely match the peaks found for the target genes ORF1ab+N, viz. Ct=18.54+/-2.31 and Ct=32.02+/-0.49 as well as in Walker et al [12]. Similar results were found in [13] and [14]. The cold peak seems likely to be associated with residue from a previous infection. The distributions for gene targets in cfvroc Pillar 2 [15,16] are also bimodal but the peaks occur at lower values of Ct. This suggests the results are machine/sample dependent and emphasises the need for calibration, if quality control in PCR testing is to be improved.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study used only openly available human data that were originally located at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/surveys/informationforhouseholdsandindividuals/householdandindividualsurveys/covid19infectionsurvey https://github.com/nicholasdavies/cfrvoc https://zenodo.org/record/5105921I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HlRrd5b-gcSib1362brJ92kf6ch-kLoQ/view?usp=drivesdk https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vkptBSjjUstTr2ZIddk0IyAJdrs1v1fH/view?usp=drivesdk