RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Bacterial contamination of Healthcare workers’ mobile phones in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.05.27.22275700
DO 10.1101/2022.05.27.22275700
A1 Zenbaba, Demisu
A1 Sahiledengle, Biniyam
A1 Beressa, Girma
A1 Desta, Fikreab
A1 Teferu, Zinash
A1 Nugusu, Fikadu
A1 Atlaw, Daniel
A1 Shiferaw, Zerihun
A1 Mamo, Ayele
A1 Negash, Wogane
A1 Negash, Getahun
A1 Mama, Mohammedaman
A1 Nigussie, Eshetu
A1 Chattu, Vijay Kumar
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/27/2022.05.27.22275700.abstract
AB Background Mobile phones are potential reservoirs for pathogens and sources of healthcare-associated illnesses. More microbes can be found on a mobile phone than on a man’s lavatory seat, the sole of a shoe, or a door handle. When examining patients, frequent handling of mobile phones can spread bacteria and provide a suitable breeding environment for numerous microorganisms. Nevertheless, evidence of bacterial contamination of mobile phones among healthcare workers in Africa was not conclusive. Thus, this meta-analysis and systematic review was conducted to estimate the pooled prevalence of bacterial contamination of mobile phones used by healthcare workers and the most frequent bacterial isolates in Africa.Methods We systematically retrieved relevant studies using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, POPLINE, HINARI, Science Direct, Cochrane Library databases, and Google Scholar from 2009 to 2021 publication year. We included observational studies that reported the prevalence of bacterial contamination of mobile phones among healthcare workers. Two independent authors assessed the quality of the studies. The DerSimonian-random Laird’s effect model was used to calculate effect estimates for the pooled prevalence of bacterial contamination in mobile phones, as well as a 95% confidence interval (CI).Results Among 3882 retrieved studies, 23 eligible articles with a total sample size of 2,623 study participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of mobile phones bacterial contamination among healthcare workers was 83.9% (95% CI: 80.6, 87.2%; I2 = 98%, p-value < 0.001). The most dominant type of bacteria isolated in this review was coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) which accounted for 44.5% of the pooled contamination rate of mobile phones used by healthcare workers, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (32.3%), and Escherichia coli (8.4%).Conclusion The review indicated that the contamination with a different bacterial isolate of mobile phones used by health care workers was high. The most dominant bacterial isolates were Coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. Hence, these findings would have implications for policymakers and resource allocation for preventive measures initiatives.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicableI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableThe manuscript contains all pertinent information.