PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Russo, Giuliano
AU  - Cassenote, Alex
AU  - de Oliveira, Bruno Luciano Carneiro Alves
AU  - Scheffer, Mario
TI  - Demographic and professional risk factors of COVID-19 infections among physicians in low- and middle-income settings; findings from a representative survey in two Brazilian states
AID  - 10.1101/2022.05.27.22275696
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.05.27.22275696
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/27/2022.05.27.22275696.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/27/2022.05.27.22275696.full
AB  - Introduction Health workers (HWs) are a key resource for health systems worldwide, and have been affected heavily by the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence is consolidating on incidence and associated drivers of infections, predominantly in high-income settings. It is however still unclear what the risk factors may be for specific health professions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a representative sample of 1,183 medical doctors registered with Brazil’s Federal Council of Medicine in one developed (São Paulo) and one disadvantaged state (Maranhão). Between February-June 2021, we administered a telephone questionnaire to collect data on physicians’ demographics, deployment to services, vaccination status, and self-reported COVID-19 infections. We performed descriptive, univariate, and multilevel clustered analysis to explore the association between physicians’ infection rates, and their sociodemographic and employment characteristics. A generalized linear mixed model with a binomial distribution was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio.Results We found that 35.8% of physicians in our sample were infected with COVID-19 in the first year of the pandemic. The infection rate in Maranhão (49.2%) [95% CI 45.0-53.4] was almost twice that in São Paulo (24.1%) [95% CI 20.8-27.5]. Being a physician in Maranhão [95% CI 2.08-3.57], younger than 50 years [95% CI 1.41-2.89], and having worked in a COVID-19 ward [95% CI 1.28-2.27], were positively associated with the probability of infections. Conversely, working with diagnostic services [95% CI 0.53-0.96], in administrative functions [95% CI 0.42-0.80], or in teaching and research [95% CI 0.48-0.91] was negatively associated.Conclusions Based on data from Brazil, COVID-19 infections in LMICs may be more likely in those health systems with lower physician-to-patient ratios, and younger doctors working in COVID-19 wards may be infected more frequently. Such findings may be used to identify policies to mitigate COVID-19 effects on HWs in LMICs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study received support from the Confap-MRC call for Health Systems Research Networks. Specifically, GR received the award from the Newton Fund/ Medical Research Council (UK), Grant Reference MR/R022747/1. AJC and MS received the award from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP-Brazil), 2017/50356-7. BdO received the award from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão (FAPEMA-Brazil), COOPI-00709/18.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study received the approval from the Research Ethics Committees of the Federal University of Maranhão (CEP UFMA 3.051.875), and from the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo (CEP FMUSP 3.136.269), and was approved by Brazil’s Federal Council of Medicine, that provided the list of physicians registered with the council of medicines in the two states, and the respective telephone contact details.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableThe survey dataset has now been attached to this submission - see the Supporting information material 'DBase survey physicians in Brazil'.