PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Lepping, Rebecca J.
AU  - McMillan, Miranda L.
AU  - Chadwick, Andrea L.
AU  - Mansour, Zaid M.
AU  - Martin, Laura E.
AU  - Gustafson, Kathleen M.
TI  - Autonomic Nervous System Markers of Music-Elicited Analgesia in People with Fibromyalgia: A Double-Blind Randomized Pilot Study
AID  - 10.1101/2022.05.25.22275605
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.05.25.22275605
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/26/2022.05.25.22275605.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/26/2022.05.25.22275605.full
AB  - Purpose To investigate the feasibility of using music listening by adults with fibromyalgia (FM) as a potential tool for reducing pain sensitivity.Patients and methods We report results from a double-blind two-arm parallel randomized pilot study (NCT04059042) in 9 participants with FM. Pain tolerance and threshold were measured objectively using quantitative sensory tests; autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactivity was measured with electrocardiogram. Participants were randomized to listen to instrumental Western Classical music or a nature sound control to test whether music listening elicits greater analgesic effects over simple auditory distraction. Participants also completed separate control testing with no sound that was counterbalanced between participants.Results Participants were randomized 1:1 to music or nature sounds (4 Music, 5 Nature). Although the groups were not different on FM scores, the Music group had marginally worse pain summation (p=.09) and tolerance (p=.13). The Nature group had higher Anxiety scores (p<.05). Outcome measures showed a significant Group by Session interaction for pain tolerance (p<.05) revealing that the Nature group had greater pain reduction during audio compared to silence, while the Music group had no difference between sessions. No significant effects were observed for ANS testing. Within the Music group, there was a trend of vagal response increase from baseline to music listening, but it did not reach statistical significance; this pattern was not observed in the Nature group.Conclusion Auditory listening significantly altered pain responses. There may be greater vagal response to music versus nature sounds, however, results could be due to group differences in pain and anxiety. This line of study will help determine whether music could be prophylactic for people with FM when acute pain is expected.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04059042Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/84baz Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Institutes of Health through a KUMC Frontiers Arts+Medicine Trailblazer to Rebecca Lepping (NIH UL1TR002366), NIH K23GM123320 to Andrea Chadwick, and by the KUMC Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center (HBIC Neurophysiology Core, and Cognitive Neuroscience Unit). The Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center is supported by a generous gift from Forrest and Sally Hoglund and funding from the National Institutes of Health including: UL1 TR002366: Frontiers: KU Institute for Clinical & Translational Science, and a KUMC Equipment Grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of the University of Kansas Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at https://osf.io/84baz. https://osf.io/84baz