RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Understanding the Impact of Sociocultural Gender on Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19: a Bayesian Approach
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.30.21259757
DO 10.1101/2021.06.30.21259757
A1 Gebhard, Caroline E.
A1 Sütsch, Claudia
A1 Bengs, Susan
A1 Todorov, Atanas
A1 Deforth, Manja
A1 Buehler, Karl Philipp
A1 Meisel, Alexander
A1 Schuepbach, Reto A.
A1 Zinkernagel, Annelies S.
A1 Brugger, Silvio D.
A1 Acevedo, Claudio
A1 Patriki, Dimitri
A1 Wiggli, Benedikt
A1 Gysi, Bianca
A1 Beer, Jürg H.
A1 Friedl, Andrée
A1 Twerenbold, Raphael
A1 Kuster, Gabriela M.
A1 Pargger, Hans
A1 Tschudin-Sutter, Sarah
A1 Schefold, Joerg C.
A1 Spinetti, Thibaud
A1 Henze, Chiara
A1 Pasqualini, Mina
A1 Sager, Dominik F.
A1 Mayrhofer, Lilian
A1 Grieder, Mirjam
A1 Tontsch, Janna
A1 Franzeck, Fabian
A1 Wendel Garcia, Pedro D.
A1 Hofmaenner, Daniel A.
A1 Scheier, Thomas
A1 Bartussek, Jan
A1 Haider, Ahmed
A1 Grämer, Muriel
A1 Mikail, Nidaa
A1 Rossi, Alexia
A1 Zellweger, Núria
A1 Opic, Petra
A1 Portmann, Angela
A1 von Känel, Roland
A1 Pazhenkottil, Aju P.
A1 Messerli, Michael
A1 Buechel, Ronny R.
A1 Kaufmann, Philipp A.
A1 Treyer, Valerie
A1 Siegemund, Martin
A1 Held, Ulrike
A1 Regitz-Zagrosek, Vera
A1 Gebhard, Catherine
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/23/2021.06.30.21259757.abstract
AB Background Women are overrepresented amongst individuals suffering from post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). Biological (sex) as well as sociocultural (gender) differences between women and men might account for this imbalance, yet their impact on PASC is unknown.Methods and Findings By using Bayesian models comprising >200 co-variates, we assessed the impact of social context in addition to biological data on PASC in a multi-centre prospective cohort study of 2927 (46% women) individuals in Switzerland. Women more often reported at least one persistent symptom than men (43.5% vs 32.0% of men, p<0.001) six (IQR 5–9) months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Adjusted models showed that women with personality traits stereotypically attributed to women were most often affected by PASC (OR 2.50[1.25-4.98], p<0.001), in particular when they were living alone (OR 1.84[1.25-2.74]), had an increased stress level (OR 1.06[1.03-1.09]), had undergone higher education (OR 1.30[1.08-1.54]), preferred pre-pandemic physical greeting over verbal greeting (OR 1.71[1.44-2.03]), and had experienced an increased number of symptoms during index infection (OR 1.27[1.22-1.33]).Conclusion Besides gender- and sex-sensitive biological parameters, sociocultural variables play an important role in producing sex differences in PASC. Our results indicate that predictor variables of PASC can be easily identified without extensive diagnostic testing and are targets of interventions aiming at stress coping and social support.Competing Interest StatementCG has received research grants from the Novartis Foundation and speakers fees from Sanofi Genzyme, Switzerland outside of the submitted work. The University Hospital Zurich (CG, RRB, APP, MM, PAK) holds a research contract with GE Healthcare outside of the submitted work. CG and AM have received research grants from Bayer Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work. JCS and TS reports (full departmental disclosure) grants from Orion Pharma, Abbott Nutrition International, B. Braun Medical AG, CSEM AG, Edwards Lifesciences Services GmbH, Kenta Biotech Ltd, Maquet Critical Care AB, Omnicare Clinical Research AG, Nestle, Pierre Fabre Pharma AG, Pfizer, Bard Medica S.A., Abbott AG, Anandic Medical Systems, Pan Gas AG Healthcare, Bracco, Hamilton Medical AG, Fresenius Kabi, Getinge Group Maquet AG, Draeger AG, Teleflex Medical GmbH, Glaxo Smith Kline, Merck Sharp and Dohme AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Baxter, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, CSL Behring, Novartis, Covidien, Nycomed, and Phagenesis, outside of the submitted work. The money went into departmental funds, no personal financial gain applies. All other authors declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.Funding StatementThis project is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project #196140, to CG, CEG, and VRZ), the LOOP Zurich (CG, VRZ, UH) and an unrestricted research grant from the intensive care unit (ICU) research foundation of the University Hospital of Basel (CEG). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. All authors had full access to the anonymized data in the study and share final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the responsible ethics committee of the Canton of Basel (EKNZ, ethics approval #2020-01311). Informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal representative.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesBased on the Business Administration System for Ethics Committees (BASEC) ethics approval, the non-anonymized raw data cannot be shared publicly. However, anonymised data that underlie the results reported in this article will become available to interested parties for non-commercial reasons, after the publication upon reasonable requests made to the corresponding author. Data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.