RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of anti-spike glycoprotein antibody and neutralizing antibody response of different vaccine platforms. A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial studies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.05.18.22275247
DO 10.1101/2022.05.18.22275247
A1 Mirzakhani, Mohammad
A1 Tahmasebi, Safa
A1 Dashti, Mohammadreza
A1 Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza
A1 Faghih, Manizhe
A1 Mohammadnia-Afrouzi, Mousa
A1 Gouvarchin Ghaleh, Hadi Esmaeili
A1 Amani, Jafar
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/19/2022.05.18.22275247.abstract
AB Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in late 2019 and spread globally, prompting an international effort to accelerate development of a vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 transmit among the people fast and infected thousands of people daily around the world. Because of rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among the people, there is an urgent need to prevent people from infection or hospitalization and control the disease.Methods We will search electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane (CENTRAL), Scopus, Google scholar, the key journals (vaccine and vaccines). Moreover, trial registry including clinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and ISRCTN will be searched. We will only select all clinical trial studies in any phases of evaluation (i.e. phase I, II, II, IV). For anti-spike glycoprotein antibody (IgG) response and neutralizing antibody response, we will report Ratio of Geometric Mean (RoGM), Ratio of Mean (RoM) or standardized mean difference (SMD) depends on type of articles.Discussion Various vaccine platforms have been developed to increase the resistance to the SARS-CoV2 virus and reduce hospitalization and mortality rates. The comprehensive data gathering and analysis of results will guide scientists about the best available evidence. Moreover, the current study results may indicate which of the vaccine platforms are more effective and safe for COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo foundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis is a protocol study with no data or results