RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Antibody response to SARS-CoV2 among COVID-19 confirmed cases, and correlates with neutralizing assay in a subgroup of patients in Delhi National Capital Region, India
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.05.17.22275193
DO 10.1101/2022.05.17.22275193
A1 Misra, Puneet
A1 Kant, Shashi
A1 Guleria, Randeep
A1 Rai, Sanjay
A1 Jaiswal, Abhishek
A1 Mandal, Suprakash
A1 Medigeshi, Guruprasad R
A1 Ahmad, Mohammad
A1 Rahman, Anisur
A1 Sangral, Meenu
A1 Yadav, Kapil
A1 Bairwa, Mohan
A1 Haldar, Partha
A1 Kumar, Parveen
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/17/2022.05.17.22275193.abstract
AB Background Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is the gold standard to detect neutralizing capacity of the serum antibodies. Neutralizing antibody confers protection against further infection. The present study was done with the objective to measure the antibody level against SARS-CoV2 among laboratory confirmed COVID-19 cases and to evaluate whether the presence of anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies indicate virus neutralizing capacity.Methods One hundred COVID-19 confirmed cases were recruited. Sociodemographic details and history of COVID-19 vaccination, contact with positive COVID-19 cases, and symptoms were ascertained using a self-developed semi-structured interview schedule. Serum samples of the participants were collected within three months from date of the positive report of COVID-19. The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgA, IgG and IgM antibodies), receptor binding domain antibodies (anti-RBD), and neutralizing antibodies were measured.Findings Almost all participants had Anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies (IgA, IgG and IgM) (99%) and Anti-RBD IgG antibodies (97%). However, only 69% had neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV2. Anti-RBD antibody levels were significantly higher among participants having neutralizing antibodies compared to those who didn’t.Interpretation The present study highlights that presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV2, or presence of anti-RBD antibody doesn’t necessarily imply presence of neutralizing antibodies.Funding World Health OrganisationCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by World Health OrganisationAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical permission was taken from the institute ethics committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. (Ref. No.IEC-959/04.09.2020)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDeidentified patient data will be made available with investigator support, with a signed data access agreement.