RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Feasibility and evaluation of an emergency department-based GP streaming and treatment service
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.05.13.22275043
DO 10.1101/2022.05.13.22275043
A1 Aldus, Clare
A1 Pope, Ian
A1 Brainard, Julii
A1 Ruston, Annmarie
A1 Hughes, Gareth
A1 Everden, Paul
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/16/2022.05.13.22275043.abstract
AB BACKGROUND Emergency departments (EDs) are under ever-increasing pressure. The General Practitioner Streaming and Treatment (GPST) service implemented at a large ED in England UK aimed to identify and treat patients who attended an ED but who might effectively be managed in primary care to reduce pressure on ED services.METHODS Patients attending ED were met by a GP nurse practitioner who ‘streamed’ them to the GPST service or usual ED care. Routinely collected electronic records, satisfaction questionnaires and interviews were used to evaluate patient outcomes, staff experiences, service outcomes and impacts on usual ED services.RESULTS Approximately 96% of GPST patients were seen by a clinician within one hour and all within 87 minutes. Routinely collected ED datasets indicate statistically significant reductions in patients streamed to usual ED care who had to wait > 4 hours for disposition (p=<0.005). Of 769 patients with GPST consultation (approximately 10% of all walk-in patients) 421 (55%) needed no further intervention by ED. The speed at which GPST patients were managed exceeded patients’ expectations and was a major determinant of their satisfaction. No staff expressed dissatisfaction, but some suggested possible improvements in patient eligibility criteria and built environment design features.CONCLUSIONS Concurrent provision of GPST correlated with shorter waits for ED attenders to receive health care. Patient and staff experiences of GPST were positive. A robust assessment of safety and health economic outcomes would be useful to refine eligibility criteria and cost effectiveness.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementGPST was funded by Norfolk and Waveney CCG and delivered by primary care contractor organisations. The service was hosted by the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Foundation Trust. UEA Health and Social Care Partners (UEA-HSCP) co-funded evaluation. Dr. Brainard is affiliated to the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at Kings College London in partnership with the UK Health Security Agency (UK HSA) and collaboration with the University of East Anglia. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the UEA-HSCP, NHS, NIHR, UEA, UK Department of Health or HSA.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital and University of East Anglia Faculty of Medicine and Health Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are patient specific, sensitive and not available publicly.