RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Understanding Health worker Perspectives on Risk Screening for HIV Testing - A Qualitative Study from Zimbabwe
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.05.09.22274852
DO 10.1101/2022.05.09.22274852
A1 Mugauri, Hamufare D.
A1 Chirenda, Joconiah
A1 Takarinda, Kudakwashe
A1 Mugurungi, Owen
A1 Ncube, Getrude
A1 Chikondowa, Ishmael
A1 Mantiziba, Patrick
A1 Tshimanga, Mufuta
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/10/2022.05.09.22274852.abstract
AB Background The use of screening tools during targeted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing services improves efficiency by identifying individuals who are likely to test positive. Effective utilization of screening tools requires an understanding of health care worker perception and willingness to use the tools. We determined health workers’ perspectives on screening tools to enhance their effective and consistent utilisation.Methods We conducted a qualitative study among healthcare workers at 8 selected primary healthcare facilities in Zimbabwe. Interviewer guided, in-depth interviews were conducted with healthcare workers and their immediate supervisors. Inductive and deductive coding (hybrid) was applied to develop and analyze themes following a framework built around the grounded theory model to describe perspectives that influence the effective and consistent utilization of HIV screening tools and suggestions for improved eligibility screening.Results Behavioural factors facilitating the utilisation of the screening tool included motivation to adhere to standard practice, awareness of screening role in targeting testing, and its ability to manage workload through screening out ineligible clients. This was evident across service delivery levels. Barriers included limited healthcare capacity, confidentiality space, multiple screening tools and opaque screening in/out criteria and the potential of clients not responding to screening questions truthfully.Conclusions Across geographical and service delivery levels, correct placing of the screening tool at HIV testing entry point, healthcare worker knowledge on screening in/out criteria emerged as enablers for correct and consistent use of the screening tools. Further, standardizing the tools used would improve the utilisation of the correct tool.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approval to conduct this study was obtained from the Ministry of Health and Child Care head office, the Joint Research Ethics Committee for the University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences and Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals (JREC 280/2021) and the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (MRCZ/A/2783). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before conducting FDGs and recording the participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files