RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against general SARS-CoV-2 infection from the omicron variant: A retrospective cohort study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.05.06.22274771
DO 10.1101/2022.05.06.22274771
A1 Rennert, Lior
A1 Ma, Zichen
A1 McMahan, Christopher S.
A1 Dean, Delphine
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/07/2022.05.06.22274771.abstract
AB Objective To estimate the effectiveness of 2-dose and 3-dose mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) against general SARS-CoV-2 infection (asymptomatic or symptomatic) caused by the omicron variant.Design Propensity-score matched retrospective Cohort Study.Setting Large public university undergoing weekly Covid-19 testing in South Carolina, USA.Participants Population consists of 24,145 university students and employees undergoing weekly Covid-19 testing between January 3rd and January 31st, 2022. The analytic sample was constructed via propensity score matching on vaccination status: Unvaccinated, completion of 2-dose mRNA series within previous 5 months, and receipt of mRNA booster dose within previous 5 months. The resulting analytic sample consists of 1,944 university students and 658 university employees.Intervention Vaccination with a two dose or 3 dose regimen of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine.Results Booster protection against any SARS-CoV-2 infection was 66.4% among employees (95% CI: 46.1-79.0%; P<.001) and 45.4% among students (95% CI: 30.0-57.4%; P<.001). Compared to the 2-dose mRNA series, estimated increase in protection from the booster dose was 40.8% among employees (P=.024) and 37.7% among students (P=.001). We did not have enough evidence to conclude a statistically significant protective effect of the 2-dose mRNA vaccination series, nor did we have enough evidence to conclude that protection waned in the 5-month period after receipt of the 2nd or 3rd mRNA dose. Furthermore, we did not find evidence that protection varied by manufacturer.Conclusions Covid-19 mRNA booster doses offer moderate protection against any SARS-CoV-2 infection caused by the omicron variant and provide a substantial increase in protection relative to the 2-dose mRNA vaccination series.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementLR and DD acknowledge support from US National Institutes of Health (P20 GM121342) during conduct of this study. DD acknowledges support from the State of South Carolina (CARES act) for building of the on-campus Covid-19 testing lab and support from US National institutes of Health (R01 MH111366) during conduct of this study. LR, ZM, and CM acknowledge salary support from Clemson University for consulting and modelling work pertaining to development and evaluation of public health strategies (project #1502934).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical review for this study was obtained by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Clemson University (IRB # 2021-043-02).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData collected for this study has not received institutional approval to be shared at this time.