RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Time trends in social contacts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONNECT study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.10.06.21264632
DO 10.1101/2021.10.06.21264632
A1 Drolet, Mélanie
A1 Godbout, Aurélie
A1 Mondor, Myrto
A1 Béraud, Guillaume
A1 Drolet-Roy, Léa
A1 Lemieux-Mellouki, Philippe
A1 Bureau, Alexandre
A1 Demers, Éric
A1 Boily, Marie-Claude
A1 Sauvageau, Chantal
A1 De Serres, Gaston
A1 Hens, Niel
A1 Beutels, Philippe
A1 Dervaux, Benoit
A1 Brisson, Marc
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/05/2021.10.06.21264632.abstract
AB Background Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries, including Canada, have adopted unprecedented physical distancing measures such as closure of schools and non-essential businesses, and restrictions on gatherings and household visits. We described time trends in social contacts for the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods in Quebec, Canada.Methods CONNECT is a population-based study of social contacts conducted shortly before (2018/2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020 – February 2021), using the same methodology for both periods. We recruited participants by random-digit-dialing and collected data by self-administered web-based questionnaires. Questionnaires documented socio-demographic characteristics and social contacts for two assigned days. A contact was defined as a two-way conversation at a distance ≤2 meters or as a physical contact, irrespective of masking. We used weighted generalized linear models with a Poisson distribution and robust variance (taking possible overdispersion into account) to compare the mean number of social contacts over time by characteristics.Results A total of 1291 and 5516 Quebecers completed the study before and during the pandemic, respectively. Contacts significantly decreased from a mean of 8 contacts/day prior to the pandemic to 3 contacts/day during the spring 2020 lockdown. Contacts remained lower than the pre-COVID period thereafter (lowest=3 contacts/day during the Christmas 2020/2021 holidays, highest=5 in September 2020). Contacts at work, during leisure activities/other locations, and at home with visitors showed the greatest decreases since the beginning of the pandemic. All sociodemographic subgroups showed significant decreases of contacts since the beginning of the pandemic. The mixing matrices illustrated the impact of public health measures (e.g. school closure, gathering restrictions) with fewer contacts between children/teenagers and fewer contacts outside of the three main diagonals of contacts between same-age partners/siblings and between children and their parents.Conclusion Physical distancing measures in Quebec significantly decreased social contacts, which most likely mitigated the spread of COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Canadian Immunization Research Network, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (foundation scheme grant FDN-143283), the Institut National de Sante Publique du Quebec, and the Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Sante research (scholars award to MB).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The CONNECT study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Centre de recherche du CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval (project 2016-2172).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the dataset containing sensitive personal data. Aggregated data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.