RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The impact of relationship to cancer patient and extent of caregiving on adherence to cancer screening in a diverse inner-city community
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.29.22273770
DO 10.1101/2022.04.29.22273770
A1 Matsumura, Cynthia
A1 Reaves, Brieyona C.
A1 Rapkin, Bruce D.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/03/2022.04.29.22273770.abstract
AB Introduction The number of individuals called upon to provide support for cancer patients within their personal networks is steadily increasing. Prior studies show that caregiver screening rates either decrease due to caregiving demands and associated fatalism or increase due to risk perception and healthcare involvement. However, there remains a gap in research in understanding how cancer screening relates to extent of caregiving and relationship to cancer patient, particularly non-family/spouse. This study aims to assess the impact of degrees of relationship to cancer patient(s) and extent of caregiving on adherence to breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer screening guidelines.Methods Participants of Bronx, New York were recruited online or through community events to complete a set of core items adapted from the NCI Health Information National Trends Survey and other sources. Logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with variation in screening.Results Analyses were based on 1430 participants (73% female, mean age 50 years, 43% Hispanic). An unexpectedly large proportion had cancer within their families (72%) and/or provided some support to a cancer patient (79%). Four support patterns were found-none, emotional support only, less intensive, and more intensive support. Women who provided emotional support only were less likely to be screened for breast and cervical cancer. Among more active caregivers, cervical and prostate cancer screening were greater among those who provided more intensive support.Conclusions Having family or friends with cancer is a normative experience that affects one’s own preventive care. Those with a family member or spouse with cancer have increased personal screening. As involvement in cancer caregiving deepens, one’s own screening rises. Caregivers that provided only emotional support are the exception, potentially because they have greater distance from the cancer experience. Findings suggest the potential value of tailoring interventions to address personal experiences with cancer caregiving.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was primarily supported by an administrative supplement from the National Cancer Institute to the Albert Einstein Cancer Center Support Grant (3P30CA013330), Dr. I. David Goldman, Principal Investigator. BCR and BDR received salary support from this supplement. CM received a Summer Research Fellowship for Medical Students from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The funders did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB 20177911 of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.