PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kasonia, K
AU  - Tindanbil, D
AU  - Kitonsa, J
AU  - Baisley, K
AU  - Zalwango, F
AU  - Enria, L
AU  - Mansaray, A
AU  - James, M
AU  - Nije, Y
AU  - Tata, D Tetsa
AU  - Lawal, B J
AU  - Drammeh, A
AU  - Lowe, B
AU  - Mukadi-Bamuleka, D
AU  - Mounier-Jack, S
AU  - Nakiyimba, F
AU  - Obady, P
AU  - Muhavi, J
AU  - Bangura, J S
AU  - Greenwood, B
AU  - Samai, M
AU  - Leigh, B
AU  - Watson-Jones, D
AU  - Kavunga-Membo, H
AU  - Ruzagira, E
AU  - Gallagher, K E.
TI  - The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision & utilisation of primary health care services in Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kambia district, Sierra Leone & Masaka district, Uganda
AID  - 10.1101/2022.04.28.22274416
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.04.28.22274416
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/28/2022.04.28.22274416.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/28/2022.04.28.22274416.full
AB  - Introduction This study aimed to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the number of people seen at public facilities in Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Sierra Leone for essential primary healthcare services.Methods The number of weekly consultations for antenatal care (ANC), outpatient (OPD), expanded programme on immunisations (EPI), family planning (FP) services and HIV, for the period of January 2018-December 2020, were collected from 25 primary healthcare facilities in Masaka district, Uganda, 21 health centres in Goma, DRC, and 29 facilities in Kambia district, Sierra Leone. Negative binomial regression models accounting for facility level clustering and season were used to analyse changes in activity levels between 2018, 2019 and 2020.Results We found no evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic affected the number of OPD, EPI or ANC consultations in Goma. Family planning consultations were 17% lower in March-July 2020 compared to 2019, but this recovered by December 2020. New diagnoses of HIV were 34% lower throughout 2020 compared to 2019. Compared to the same periods in 2019, facilities in Sierra Leone had 18-29% fewer OPD consultations throughout 2020, and 27% fewer DTP3 doses in March-July 2020, but this had recovered by Jul-Dec. There was no evidence of differences in other services. In Uganda there were 20-35% fewer under-5 OPD consultations, 21-66% fewer MCV1 doses, and 48-51% fewer new diagnoses of HIV, throughout 2020, compared to 2019. There was no difference in the number of HPV doses delivered in 2020 compared to 2019.Conclusions The level of disruption appeared to correlate with the strength of lockdown measures in the different settings and community attitudes towards the risk posed by COVID-19. Mitigation strategies such as health communications campaigns and outreach services proved important to limit the impact of lockdowns on primary healthcare services.What is already known on this topic The COVID-19 pandemic and the response measures put in place caused disruption to the provision and utilisation of primary healthcare services worldwide.What this study adds We document that the COVID-19 pandemic had a varied impact on different services in three distinct settings on the African continent. The extent that the pandemic impacted services correlated with the stringency of the lockdowns, community perceptions of the level of danger posed by the pandemic and communities’ prior exposure to Ebola epidemics and concomitant response measures.How this study might affect research, practice, or policy strategies such as communication campaigns and outreach services limited the impact of lockdowns on essential services and would be valuable strategies to implement in future epidemics.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project was funded by a UKRI (MRC), DHSC (NIHR) research grant (GEC1017, MR/V029363/1, PI Katherine Gallagher)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Local health authorities were engaged in the conceptualisation and implementation of the study; the public were not involved in the conceptualisation or design of the study. This study was approved by the Comite National dEthique de la Sante (CNES) of the DRC, the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review committee, the Uganda Virus Research Institute Research Ethics Committee, the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee and local health authorities in each area. No informed consent was required for this study as individual level data were not collected.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors