RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Critical interventions for demand generation in Zambia, Nepal, and Senegal with regards to the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.25.22274035
DO 10.1101/2022.04.25.22274035
A1 Hester, Kyra A
A1 Sakas, Zoe
A1 Ogutu, Emily Awino
A1 Dixit, Sameer
A1 Ellis, Anna S.
A1 Yang, Chenmua
A1 Chanda, Chama
A1 Freeman, Matthew C.
A1 Orenstein, Walter A.
A1 Sarr, Moussa
A1 Bednarczyk, Robert A.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/28/2022.04.25.22274035.abstract
AB Introduction Childhood vaccination is an effective intervention for lowering the burden of infectious disease. Progress was made to increase coverage globally, but vaccine hesitancy and refusal has threatened to erode said increases. The 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination (“5C”) model provides a validated measure of “vaccine hesitancy or confidence” to assess individual thoughts and behaviors behind vaccination. Our purpose was to investigate population-level factors that contributed to high and sustained vaccination coverage via interventions in Zambia, Nepal, and Senegal, and alignment with the 5Cs.Methods FDGs and KIIs were collected at the national, regional, district, health facility, and community levels. We assessed the demand environment, as relayed by participants, and identified interventions that key informants reported as successful for demand generation, then retroactively aligned the interventions with the 5C constructs.Results Demand was positively correlated with high confidence and collective responsibility. Psychological constraints sometimes impacted demand. Physical constraints created barriers in some communities, particularly difficult to access (i.e., mountainous). Occasionally, physical constraints did not affect vaccination behavior - parents believed the benefits of vaccination worth pursuing. Factors negatively correlated with demand and intent, complacency and calculation, had limited impact. The most critical interventions were: targeted and tailored health education activities (i.e., media partnerships, school outreach); community engagement; community ownership; and involvement of community (i.e., community health workers, leaders, religious figures).Conclusion We found similar interventions were used to generate demand, and those strategies aligned with the 5C constructs. Categorizing interventions by drivers of demand may help strategic planning and the division of resources; decision makers may choose to implement our suggested interventions. Assessing the 5Cs allows for decision-makers to operationalize demand generation into concrete interventions and policies, and determine the individual impact of these constructs on the population and focus efforts on interventions tailored to a specific need.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://submit.medrxiv.org/submission/pdf?msid=MEDRXIV/2021/267018&roleName=author&msversion=1 Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA (OPP1195041) with a planning grant from Gates Ventures, LLC, Kirkland, WA.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board committee of Emory University waived ethical approval for this work. The Nepal Health Research Council in Nepal provided ethical approval for this work. The National Ethical Committee for Health Research in Senegal provided ethical approval for this work. The University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics and the National Health Research Authority in Zambia gave ethical approval for this project. All participants provided written informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified data are available upon request. https://osf.io/7ys4a/?view_only=739ca7a72f9749118b4aa3d2f7b655d9