RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 COVID-19 third wave experience in India, a survey of 5971 adults
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.26.22274273
DO 10.1101/2022.04.26.22274273
A1 Jayadevan, Rajeev
A1 Shenoy, Ramesh
A1 Anithadevi, TS
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/28/2022.04.26.22274273.abstract
AB Background The third wave of the pandemic in India lasted from January till March 2022, and breakthrough infections were common. Third dose of vaccine was rolled out to priority groups in the beginning of 2022. There is no published information available about the clinical outcomes in this context.AimsTo assess the community level experience of the pandemic, with focus on the third wave and vaccination in India.To describe the experience of the boosted and non-boosted population during the 3rd wave.To study the public perception about the precautionary (3rd) dose in India.Results Among 5971 respondents, 98.6% were vaccinated, 40% of whom had also received the 3rd dose. Age range: 24% were below 40, 50% were 40-59, 26% were >60 years.45% were women, 53% were healthcare workers.COVID-19 was reported by 3361 (56%) respondents. Among those who reported COVID-19, 2311 (70%) were infected during the third wave. Severe symptoms occurred in <1%, while moderate severity was reported by 42%. Repeated bouts of infection were common; 15% of those with a history of COVID-19 had been infected at least twice. 44% of the respondents (2610/5971) did not report a history of COVID-19.The third dose was taken by 2383 individuals, of whom 30% reported COVID-19 during the 3rd wave. The boosted group also had higher N95 use, and a greater proportion of healthcare workers. Among those who did not take a 3rd dose, 45% reported COVID-19 in the 3rd wave. COVID-19 incidence was lower at 27% among those in this group who had recently received their second dose. Longer gap after the second dose correlated with higher chance of infection during 3rd wave. Giving a 3rd dose before a 6-month gap since the second dose did not make a difference in infection rate.Covaxin and Covishield recipients had the same incidence of COVID-19 during the third wave.While 35% of the respondents believed it was helpful, 65% of the respondents were either uncertain or disapproving of the benefit of a 3rd dose.Conclusions30% of respondents who received a 3rd dose went on to get COVID-19 during the 3rd wave.Younger adults were more likely to be affected during 3rd wave.Although severe disease was rare, 42% reported having symptoms of moderate severity that could temporarily incapacitate people, affecting their routine and productivity.The proportion of different grades of severity was similar among all vaccinated people, regardless of whether they received a 3rd dose.Reinfections occurred in 15%, and were not always milder.Among those who did not receive a 3rd dose, 45% reported COVID-19 in the 3rd wave. However, this group had lower use of N95 masks (50%) than the 3rd dose group (68%) which may have reduced the overall protection.The longer the gap after the second dose, the greater was the chance of reporting COVID-19.People who received their second dose recently had the same incidence of third wave COVID-19 as following a 3rd dose.The 3rd dose, given too close to the second dose, made no difference in the infection rate.Covaxin and Covishield recipients had the same rate of COVID-19 in the third wave.Although the respondents were 98.6% vaccinated at baseline, there was considerable uncertainty (65%) amongst them about the benefit of a 3rd dose.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of Indian Medical Association Cochin India, located at IMA House, JNI Stadium, Palarivattom, Kochi 682025 gave ethical approval for this work. Ethics committee: Dr VD Pradeepkumar and Dr Abraham Paul, Past president, Indian Medical AssociationI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript