PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rothkopf, Michael M.
AU  - Pant, Mohan D.
AU  - Brown, Rebecca
AU  - Haselhorst, Jamie
AU  - Gagliardotto, Francine
AU  - Tallman, Allison
AU  - Stevenson, Debbie
AU  - DePalma, Andrew
AU  - Saracco, Michael
AU  - Rosenberg, Dan
AU  - Proudan, Vladimir
AU  - Shareef, Kishwar
AU  - Ayub, Nudrat
TI  - Impact of a Multidisciplinary Nutritional Support Team on Quality Improvement for Patients Receiving Home Parenteral Nutrition
AID  - 10.1101/2022.04.06.22273454
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.04.06.22273454
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/27/2022.04.06.22273454.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/27/2022.04.06.22273454.full
AB  - Introduction Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is an essential therapy for patients requiring long term nutritional support. The Amerita Quality Improvement Project for HPN Patients (QIP-PN) explored opportunities for QI for patients under its service. As a component of QIP-PN,we studied the effect of a Physician Nutrition Expert (PNE)-led multidisciplinary nutritional support team (MNST) on HPN care.Objective To test the effect of an MNST on adherence to protocols, outcomes and QOL in HPN.Methods The study was divided into 3 phases: data review (phases 1a and 1b), observation (phase 2) and intervention (phase 3). 7 Amerita branch locations were selected as “study branches” based upon their volume of long-term HPN cases. All patients in the study were drawn from this population. Since the study was part of a QI project rather than a randomized controlled study, we employed a quasi-experimental design with a case-matched control group (control). Data were collected on demographics, treating physicians PNE status, HPN care variables, recommended interventions, quality-of-life assessment, adverse outcomes and hospitalizations. Paired t-test was used to compare continuous data between phases 2 and 3. Comparison between the study and control groups utilized a negative binomial regression model. Statistical analysis utilized R (https://www.r-project.org/).Results 34 patients were reviewed in phase 1a and 197 in phase 1b . 40 study patients completed phase 2 and progressed into phase 3, of whom 30 completed ≥60 therapy days. Improvements in weight, BMI and QOL were seen in the study patients during intervention. Recommendations made and accepted by treating physicians differed based on PNE status. Study patients had fewer adverse outcomes and related hospitalizations than controls.Conclusion MNST recommendations improved clinical, biochemical parameters and patients’ self-reported overall health. MNST input reduced adverse outcomes, hospitalization and hospital length of stay. This study highlights the potential for MNST to have a significant impact on the quality and overall cost of HPN management.Competing Interest StatementDr. Rothkopf and Mr. Saracco are paid consultants for Amerita, Inc. Ms. Brown, Haselhorst, Gagliardotto, Tallman, Stevenson, Mr. DePalma and Rosenberg are paid employees of Amerita, Inc. Drs Pant, Proudan, Shareef and Ayub have no conflicts.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The protocol was granted Institutional Review Board (IRB) exemption under NIH guidelines (45CFR 46.104(d)(2)) by the Western IRB on September 4, 2019.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors