RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 ClearSpeechTogether: a rater blinded, single, controlled feasibility study of speech intervention for people with progressive ataxia
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.19.22273510
DO 10.1101/2022.04.19.22273510
A1 Lowit, Anja
A1 Cox, Jessica
A1 Loucas, Melissa
A1 Grassly, Jennifer
A1 Egan, Aisling
A1 van Brenk, Frits
A1 Hadjivassiliou, Marios
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/22/2022.04.19.22273510.abstract
AB Background Progressive ataxias frequently lead to speech disorders and consequently impact on communication participation and psychosocial wellbeing. Whilst recent studies demonstrate the potential for improvements in these areas, these treatments generally require intensive input which can reduce acceptability of the approach.A new model of care – ClearSpeechTogether – is proposed which maximises treatment intensity whilst minimising demands on clinician. This study aimed to establish feasibility and accessibility of this approach and at the same time determine the potential benefits and adverse effects on people with progressive ataxias.Method The study targeted people with progressive ataxia and mild-moderate speech and gross motor impairment. ClearSpeechTogether consisted of four individual sessions over two weeks followed by 20 patient-led group sessions over four weeks. All sessions were provided online. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected for evaluation.Results Nine participants completed treatment. Feasibility and acceptability were high and no adverse effects were reported. Statistical tests found significantly reduced vocal strain, improved intelligibility for reading, and increased participation and confidence. Participant interviews highlighted the value of group support, from psychosocial perspectives and in supporting speech strategy internalisation and generalisation.Discussion ClearSpeechTogether presented an effective intervention in a small group of people with progressive ataxia. It matched or exceeded the outcomes previously reported for intensive, individual therapy while minimising clinician time demands. Furthermore, its unique peer led group intervention design appeared effective in addressing intractable psychosocial issues. ClearSpeechTogether is potentially cost-effective, providing intensive delivery with few clinician sessions, thus maximising the input available from health care providers.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialISRCTN93368860Funding StatementThis study was funded by Ataxia UKAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics committee of Strathclyde University gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors