PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Banholzer, Nicolas AU - Lison, Adrian AU - Özcelik, Dennis AU - Stadler, Tanja AU - Feuerriegel, Stefan AU - Vach, Werner TI - The methodologies to assess the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review AID - 10.1101/2022.04.14.22273858 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.04.14.22273858 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/18/2022.04.14.22273858.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/18/2022.04.14.22273858.full AB - Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as school closures and stay-at-home orders, have been implemented around the world to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Their effects on health-related outcomes have been the subject of numerous empirical studies. However, these studies show fairly large variation among methodologies in use, reflecting the absence of an established methodological framework. On the one hand, variation in methodologies may be desirable to assess the robustness of results; on the other hand, a lack of common standards can impede comparability among studies. To establish a comprehensive overview over the methodologies in use, we conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on health-related outcomes between January 1, 2020 and January 12, 2021 (n=248). We identified substantial variation in methodologies with respect to study setting, outcome, intervention, methodological approach, and effect assessment. On this basis, we point to shortcomings of existing studies and make recommendations for the design of future studies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=231842 Funding StatementNB and SF acknowledge funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) as part of the Eccellenza grant 186932 on "Data-driven health management". The funding bodies had no control over design, conduct, data, analysis, review, reporting, or interpretation of the research conducted.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This systematic methodology review used ONLY openly available human data that was published in the corresponding literature reviewed.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe full data extracted from the studies in this review is available in machine-readable format at https://github.com/adrian-lison/methodologies-npi-effects. https://github.com/adrian-lison/methodologies-npi-effects