RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Impact of a Multidisciplinary Nutritional Support Team (MNST) on Quality Improvement in Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.06.22273454
DO 10.1101/2022.04.06.22273454
A1 Rothkopf, Michael M.
A1 Pant, Mohan D.
A1 Brown, Rebecca
A1 Haselhorst, Jamie
A1 Gagliardotto, Francine
A1 Tallman, Allison
A1 Stevenson, Debbie
A1 DePalma, Andrew
A1 Saracco, Michael
A1 Rosenberg, Dan
A1 Proudan, Vladimir
A1 Shareef, Kishwar
A1 Ayub, Nudrat
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/16/2022.04.06.22273454.abstract
AB Introduction HPN is essential for patients requiring long term nutritional support. This Quality Improvement Project for HPN Patients (QIP-PN) studied the effect of a Physician Nutrition Expert (PNE)- led multidisciplinary nutritional support team (MNST) on HPN care.Objective To test the effect of an MNST on adherence to protocols, outcomes and QOL in HPN.Methods Data review was conducted in phases 1a and 1b, observation in phase 2 and intervention in phase 3. In Phase 3 the MNST made recommendations to treating physicians. All long-term HPN patients were offered study participation. 75 signed consent forms. Treating physician study participation agreements were signed for 42 patients (the study group). A random sample of 30 long-term HPN patients comprised the case-matched control group (control). Data were collected on demographics, treating physicians PNE status, HPN care variables, recommended interventions, quality-of-life assessment, adverse outcomes and hospitalizations. Independent samples t-test was used for continuous data between study group and control group. Paired t-test was used for phase 2 and phase 3 patient data. Comparison between the study and control group utilized a negative binomial regression model. Statistical analysis utilized R (https://www.r-project.org/).Results 34 patients were reviewed retrospectively in phase 1a and 197 prospectively in phase 1b. 40 study patients completed phase 2 and progressed into phase 3, of whom 30 completed ≥60 therapy days. Improvements in weight, BMI and QOL were seen in the study patients during intervention. Recommendations made and accepted by treating physicians differed based on PNE status. Study patients had fewer adverse outcomes and related hospitalizations than case matched controls.Conclusion MNST recommendations improved clinical, biochemical parameters and patients’ self-reported overall health. It reduced adverse outcomes, hospitalization and hospital length of stay. MNST input could have a significant impact on the quality and cost of HPN care.Competing Interest StatementDr. Rothkopf and Mr. Saracco are consultants for Amerita, Inc. Ms. Brown, Haselhorst, Gagliardotto, Tallman, Stevenson, Mr. DePalma and Rosenberg are employees of Amerita, Inc.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The protocol was granted Institutional Review Board (IRB) exemption under NIH guidelines (45CFR 46.104(d)(2)) by the Western IRB on September 4, 2019.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors