PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Barbaric, Antonia AU - Munteanu, Cosmin AU - Ross, Heather J. AU - Cafazzo, Joseph A. TI - A Voice App Design for Heart Failure Self-Management: A Pilot Study AID - 10.1101/2022.04.06.22273509 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.04.06.22273509 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273509.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/10/2022.04.06.22273509.full AB - There is a growing interest to investigate the feasibility of using voice user interfaces as a platform for digital therapeutics in chronic disease management. While mostly deployed as smartphone applications, some demographics struggle when using touch screens and often cannot complete tasks independently. This research aimed to evaluate how heart failure patients interacted with a voice app version of an already existing digital therapeutic, Medly, using a mixed-methods concurrent triangulation approach. The objective was to determine the acceptability and feasibility of the voice app by better understanding who this platform is be best suited for. Quantitative data included engagement levels and accuracy rates. Participants (n=20) used the voice app over a four week period and completed questionnaires and semi-structured interviews relating to acceptability, ease of use, and workload. The average engagement level was 73%, with a 14% decline between week one and four. The difference in engagement levels between the oldest and youngest demographic was the most significant, 84% and 43% respectively. The Medly voice app had an overall accuracy rate of 97.8% and was successful in sending data to the clinic. Users were accepting of the technology (ranking it in the 80th percentile) and felt it did not require a lot of work (2.1 on a 7-point Likert scale). However, 13% of users were less inclined to use the voice app at the end of the study. The following themes and subthemes emerged: (1) feasibility of clinical integration: user adaptation to voice app’s conversational style, device unreliability, and (2) voice app acceptability: good device integration within household, users blamed themselves for voice app problems, and voice app missing desirable user features. The voice app proved to be most beneficial to those who: are older, have flexible schedules, are confident with using technology, and are experiencing other medical conditions.Competing Interest StatementJoseph Cafazzo and Heather Ross are part of the team that founded the Medly system under the intellectual property policies of the UHN and may benefit from future commercialization of this technology.Funding StatementThis work has been funded by the Wolfond Chair of Digital Health and the Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, both part of the University Health Network in Toronto, Ontario. Amazon supplied the smart speaker devices that were needed for the study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Research Ethics Board (REB), part of the University Health Network (UHN) located in Toronto, Ontario Canada provided the approval to conduct this study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableThe work that was produced and collected in this study is stored in University Health Network (UHN) servers. Our agreement with the UHN Research Ethics Board describes very specific circumstances that does not allow us to make the data publicly available and prohibits us from sharing the data on a public platform.HFheart failureSUSSystem Usability ScaleUHNUniversity Health NetworkUTAUT2Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of TechnologyVUIvoice user interface