PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Alvand, Ashkan AU - Kuruvilla-Mathew, Abin AU - Kirk, Ian J. AU - Roberts, Reece P. AU - Pedersen, Mangor AU - Purdy, Suzanne C. TI - Altered brain network topology in children with Auditory Processing Disorder: a resting-state multi-echo fMRI study AID - 10.1101/2022.04.05.22273478 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.04.05.22273478 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/06/2022.04.05.22273478.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/06/2022.04.05.22273478.full AB - Children with auditory processing disorder (APD) experience hearing difficulties, particularly in the presence of competing sounds, despite having normal audiograms. There is considerable debate on whether APD symptoms originate from bottom-up (e.g., auditory sensory processing) and/or top-down processing (e.g., cognitive, language, memory). A related issue is that little is known about whether functional brain network topology is altered in APD. Therefore, we used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data to investigate the functional brain network organization of 57 children from 8 to 13 years old, diagnosed with APD (n=28) and without hearing difficulties (healthy control, HC; n=29). We applied complex network analysis using graph theory to assess the whole-brain integration and segregation of functional networks and brain hub architecture. Our results showed children with APD and HC have similar global network properties –i.e., an average of all brain regions– and modular organization. Still, the APD group showed different hub architecture in default mode-ventral attention, somatomotor and frontoparietal-dorsal attention modules. At the nodal level –i.e., single-brain regions–, we observed decreased participation coefficient (PC – a measure quantifying the diversity of between-network connectivity) in auditory cortical regions in APD, including bilateral superior temporal gyrus and left middle temporal gyrus. Beyond auditory regions, PC was also decreased in APD in bilateral posterior temporo-occipital cortices, left intraparietal sulcus, and right posterior insular cortex. Correlation analysis suggested a positive association between PC in the left parahippocampal gyrus and the listening-in-spatialized-noise - sentences task where APD children were engaged in auditory perception. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence of altered brain network organization in children with APD, specific to auditory networks, and shed new light on the neural systems underlying children’s listening difficulties.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by Eisdell Moore Center for Hearing and Balance Research (Grant No. 3716796).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approval for this study was granted by The University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics committee (Date: 18/10/2019, Ref. 023546). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.