RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Effect of Heat inactivation and bulk lysis on Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR Detection of the SARS-COV-2: An Experimental Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.04.22273334
DO 10.1101/2022.04.04.22273334
A1 Leta, Dereje
A1 Gutema, Gadissa
A1 Hagos, Gebremedhin Gebremichael
A1 Diriba, Regasa
A1 Bulti, Gutema
A1 Sura, Tolawak
A1 Ayana, Desta
A1 Chala, Dawit
A1 Lenjiso, Boki
A1 Bulti, Jaleta
A1 Abdella, Saro
A1 Tola, Habteyes Hailu
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/06/2022.04.04.22273334.abstract
AB The outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus - 2 has quickly turned into a global pandemic. Real-time reverse transcription Polymerase chain reaction is commonly used to diagnose as “gold standard”. Many coronaviruses are sensitive to heat and chemicals. Heat and chemical inactivation of samples is considered a possible method to reduce the risk of transmission, but the effect of heating and chemical treatment on the measurement of the virus is still unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effect of heat inactivation and chemical bulklysis on virus detection. The laboratory-based experimental study design was conducted in Ethiopian Public Health Institute from August to November 2020 on the samples referred to the laboratory for Coronavirus disease-19 testing. Tests were performed on eighty Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab samples using the Abbott Real-time severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus - 2 assays, a test for the qualitative detection of virus in the sample. Data were analyzed and described by mean and standard deviation. Repeated measurement analysis of variance was used to assess the mean difference between the three temperatures and bulk lysis on viral detection. Post-hock analysis was employed to locate the place of significant differences. P-values less than 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance. About 6.2% (5/80) of samples were changed to negative results in heat inactivation at 60°C and 8.7% (7/80) of samples were changed to negative in heat inactivation at 100°C. The Cyclic threshold values of heat-inactivated samples (at 60°C, at 100°C, and bulk lysis) were significantly different from the temperature at 56°C. The efficacy of heat-inactivation varies greatly depending on temperature and duration. Therefore, local validation and verification of heat-inactivation are essential.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive ant fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical clearance was obtained from Ethiopian public health institute Scientific ethical review committee. Approval and official permission was obtained from the Ethiopian public health institute research committee to use the leftover samples in the laboratory (EPHI-IRB-296-2020). The confidentiality of the data collected was kept to a maximum and each patient identity was coded.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscriptCDCCenter Disease Control and PreventionCTCyclic ThresholdCNCyclic NumberDNADeoxyribose nucleic acidEPHIEthiopian Public Health InstituteEUAEmergency Use AuthorizationICInternal controlISOInternational Standard for OrganizationSARS-COV-2Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2RNARibonucleic acidWHOWorld Health OrganizationRT-PCRReal-time Polymerase Chain ReactionRdRpRNA dependent RNA polymeraseVTMViral Transport Media