PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Nachmanson, Daniela AU - Pagadala, Meghana AU - Steward, Joseph AU - Cheung, Callie AU - Bruce, Lauryn Keeler AU - Lee, Nicole Q. AU - O’Keefe, Thomas J. AU - Lin, Grace Y. AU - Hasteh, Farnaz AU - Morris, Gerald P. AU - Carter, Hannah AU - Harismendy, Olivier TI - Accurate genome-wide germline profiling from decade-old archival tissue DNA reveals the contribution of common variants to precancer disease outcome AID - 10.1101/2022.03.31.22273116 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.03.31.22273116 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/05/2022.03.31.22273116.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/05/2022.03.31.22273116.full AB - Background Inherited variants have been shown to contribute to cancer risk, disease progression, and response to treatment. Such studies are, however, arduous to conduct, requiring large sample sizes, cohorts or families, and more importantly, a long follow-up to measure a relevant outcome such as disease onset or progression. Unless collected for a dedicated study, germline DNA from blood or saliva are typically not available retrospectively, in contrast to surgical tissue specimens which are systematically archived.Results We evaluated the feasibility of using DNA extracted from low amounts of fixed-formalin paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue to obtain accurate germline genetic profiles. Using matching blood and archival tissue DNA from 10 individuals, we benchmarked low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (lc-WGS) combined with genotype imputation and measured genome-wide concordance of genotypes, polygenic risk scores (PRS), and HLA haplotypes. Concordance between blood and tissue was high (r2>0.94) for common genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and across 22 disease-related PRS (mean r=0.93). HLA haplotypes imputed from tissue DNA were 96.7% (Class I genes) and 82.5% (Class II genes) concordant with deep targeted sequencing of HLA from blood DNA. Using the validated methodology, we estimated breast cancer PRS in 36 patients diagnosed with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (11.7 years median follow-up time) including 22 who were diagnosed with breast cancer subsequent event (BSCE). PRS was significantly associated with BCSE (HR=2.5, 95%CI: 1.4–4.5) and the top decile patients were modeled to have a 24% chance of BCSE at 10 years, hence suggesting the addition of PRS could improve prognostic models which are currently inadequate.Conclusions The abundance and broad availability of archival tissue specimens in oncology clinics, paired with the effectiveness of germline profiling using lc-WGS and imputation, represents an alternative cost and resource-effective alternative in the design of long-term disease progression studies.Competing Interest StatementDr Harismendy is a current employee of Zentalis PharmaceuticalsFunding StatementThis work is supported by funding from the National Institute of Health (U01CA196406, U01CA196406, U01CA196383, T32GM008806, T15LM011271), and an award from the Cancer Cell Mapping Initiative (U54 CA209891), shared resources from the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA023100), The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research grant #18-022-ELA to HC and the California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program pre-doctoral fellowship to DN (28DT-0011). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or in the writing of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The lung cancer patients were consented to the UC San Diego Biorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resource, as a biorepository approved by the UC San Diego Institutional Review Board (protocols 090401 and 181755). The breast precancer patients were included in the ATHENA DCIS registry, a retrospective study approved by the UC San Diego Institutional Review Board (protocol 171481), which provided a waiver of consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRaw sequencing data pending deposition in dbGAP.