PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Kaonga, Patrick AU - Mukosha, Moses AU - Jacobs, Choolwe AU - Munakampe, Margarate Nzala AU - Sichone, Victor AU - Phiri, Christabel Chigwe AU - Makasa, Musonda AU - Vwalika, Bellington AU - Lubeya, Mwansa Ketty TI - No woman should be left behind: A decomposition analysis of socioeconomic inequalities in unsafe abortion among women presenting for abortion care services in Lusaka and Copperbelt provinces of Zambia AID - 10.1101/2022.03.29.22273119 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.03.29.22273119 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/02/2022.03.29.22273119.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/02/2022.03.29.22273119.full AB - This study measured socioeconomic-related unsafe abortion inequality among women presenting for abortion care services in Lusaka and the Copperbelt provinces of Zambia and decompose its causes. We conducted a cross-sectional study between August and September 2021. Unsafe abortion inequalities were assessed using corrected concentration index and Erreygers-type decomposition analysis was conducted to assess causes of unsafe abortion inequalities. Out of 362 women, the magnitude of unsafe abortion was 77(21.3%, [95% CI: 17.8, 24.9]). The corrected concentration index was -0.231 (95% CI: -0.309, -0.154), implying pro-poor inequality in unsafe abortion among women. Decomposition analysis showed that the major contributors of the unsafe abortion inequality were socioeconomic status (66.6%), marital status (6.3%), education (10.2%) and employment (3.7%). Also, history of unwanted pregnancy (5.1%), awareness of whether abortion is legal in Zambia (8.9%) and awareness that hospitals offered free abortion services (11.3%). The findings suggest that the unsafe abortion is a problem in Zambia and substantial inequality mainly due to socioeconomic factors. Stakeholders and policymakers should consider socioeconomic strategies to reduce unsafe abortion inequality promoting advocacy to increased access to legal safe abortion and use of modern contraceptives so that no woman is left behind in the prevention of unsafe abortion.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded by Zambia Association of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (ZAGO). The funder had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the paperAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics CommitteeI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableThe authors will make data available after accepting this manuscript for publication without restrictions.