RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in Student-Run Free Clinics: A Systematic Review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.03.31.22273259
DO 10.1101/2022.03.31.22273259
A1 Xiao, Sophia Ying
A1 Major, Catherine Kendall
A1 O’Connell, Katie A.
A1 Lee, David
A1 Lin, Christine
A1 Sarino, Esther
A1 Chen, Kevin
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/01/2022.03.31.22273259.abstract
AB Objective To assess rates of breast and cervical cancer screening at student-run free clinics to better understand challenges and strategies for advancing quality and accessibility of women’s health screening at student-run free clinics.Data sources We performed a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from database inception to 2020 using keywords related to student-run clinics, breast cancer screening, and cervical cancer screening.Study eligibility criteria We included all English-language publications describing screening rates of breast and/or cervical cancer at student-run free clinics within the United States. Five authors screened abstracts and reviewed full texts for inclusion.Study appraisal and synthesis methods Two reviewers extracted data independently for each publication using a structured data extraction table. Disagreements were resolved by group consensus. Two reviewers then assessed for risk of bias for each text using a modified Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality checklist for cross-sectional and prevalence studies. Results were synthesized qualitatively due to study heterogeneity.Results Of 3634 references identified, 12 references met study inclusion criteria. The proportion of patients up-to-date on breast cancer screening per guidelines ranged from 45% to 94%. The proportion of patients up-to-date on cervical cancer screening per guidelines ranged from 40% to 88%.Conclusion Student-run free clinics can match breast and cervical cancer screening rates amongst uninsured populations nationally, though more work is required to bridge the gap in care that exists for the underinsured and uninsured.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:n/aI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableData is extracted from public access articles published through Ovid Medline, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.Data is extracted from public access articles published through Ovid Medline, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.