PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Gallo-Barrera, Yeison David AU - Campo-Arias, Adalberto TI - Sexual Orientation Experiences of Discrimination: Dimensionality, internal consistency, and nomological validity in a diverse Colombian population AID - 10.1101/2022.02.06.22269563 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.02.06.22269563 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/01/2022.02.06.22269563.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/01/2022.02.06.22269563.full AB - The study aimed to determine the dimensionality, internal consistency, and nomological validity of the Sexual Orientation Experiences of Discrimination (SOEOD-9) among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer people in Santa Marta, Colombia. The study included 303 individuals between 18 and 70 years old. Participants completed the SOEOD-9. Dimensionality was explored using confirmatory (CFA) factor analysis; internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega; and nomological validity with Student’s test. The SOEOD-9 presented two factors that explained 51.6% of the variance and high internal consistency. Nevertheless, the CFA showed poor indicators of goodness-of-fit for the two-dimensional solution. A five-item version (SOEOD-5) improved overall performance (dimensionality, internal consistency, and nomological validity). In conclusion, the SOEOD-9 shows a two-factor internal structure with poor goodness-of-fit indicators and acceptable internal consistency and nomological validity. The SOEOD-5 presents better global indicators of dimensionality, internal consistency, and nomological validity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project was funded by Colciencias in the 2018 Young Researchers and Innovators program (Call 812 of 2018) through the Special Cooperation Agreement No. 80740-251-2019 with the Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Research Ethics Board of the Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia, gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.