RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Perceived Timing of Cutaneous Vibration and Intracortical Microstimulation of Human Somatosensory Cortex
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.12.28.21268447
DO 10.1101/2021.12.28.21268447
A1 Christie, Breanne
A1 Osborn, Luke E.
A1 McMullen, David P.
A1 Pawar, Ambarish S.
A1 Thomas, Tessy M.
A1 Bensmaia, Sliman J.
A1 Celnik, Pablo A.
A1 Fifer, Matthew S.
A1 Tenore, Francesco V.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/28/2021.12.28.21268447.abstract
AB Background Electrically stimulating the somatosensory cortex can partially restore the sense of touch. Though this technique bypasses much of the neuroaxis, prior studies with non-human primates have found that conscious detection of touch elicited by intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) lags behind the detection of vibration applied to the skin. These findings may have been influenced by a mismatch in stimulus intensity; typically, vibration is perceived as more intense than ICMS, which can significantly impact temporal perception.Objective The goal of this study was to evaluate the relative latency at which intensity-matched vibration and ICMS are perceived in a human subject.Methods A human participant implanted with microelectrode arrays in somatosensory cortex performed a reaction time task and a temporal order judgment (TOJ) task. In the reaction time task, the participant was presented with vibration or ICMS and verbal response times were obtained. In the TOJ task, the participant was sequentially presented with a pair of stimuli – vibration followed by ICMS or vice versa – and reported which stimulus occurred first.Results When vibration and ICMS were matched in intensity at a “high” stimulus level, the reaction time to vibration was 48 ms faster than ICMS. When both stimuli were perceived as lower in intensity, the difference in reaction time was even larger: vibration was perceived 90 ms before ICMS. However, in the TOJ task, vibratory and ICMS sensations arose at comparable latencies, with points of subjective simultaneity that were not significantly different from zero.Conclusions Because the perception of ICMS is slower than that of intensity-matched vibration, it may be necessary to stimulate at stronger ICMS intensities (thus decreasing reaction time) when incorporating ICMS sensory feedback into neural prostheses.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT03161067Funding StatementThis work was made possible, in part, through financial support from Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the Neurally Enhanced Operations program (contract number HR001120C0120) and the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. In addition, this work was supported with the resources and use of facilities at the Johns Hopkins Hospital.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Johns Hopkins Institutional Review Board (JH IRB) and the Naval Information Warfare Center Human Research Protection Office.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.