Geospatial analysis reveals distinct hotspots of severe mental illness - Song, Janet; Ramírez, Mauricio Castaño; Okano, Justin; Service, Susan K.; de la Hoz, Juan; Díaz-Zuluaga, Ana M; Upegui, Cristian Vargas; Gallago, Cristian; Arias, Alejandro; Sánchez, Alexandra Valderrama; Teshiba, Terri; Sabatti, Chiara; et al. (medRxiv, 2022)
Background The identification of geographic variation in incidence can be an important step in the delineation of disease risk factors, but has mostly been undertaken in upper-income countries. Here, we use Electronic Health Records (EHR) from a middle-income country, Colombia, to characterize geographic variation in major mental disorders.Method We leveraged geolocated EHRs of 16,295 patients at a psychiatric hospital serving the entire state of Caldas, all of whom received a primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or major depressive disorder at their first visit. To identify the relationship between travel time and incidence of mental illness we used a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model. We used spatial scan statistics to identify clusters of patients, stratified by diagnosis and severity: mild (outpatients) or severe (inpatients).Results We observed a significant association between incidence and travel time for outpatients (N = 11,077, relative risk (RR) = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (0.71, 0.89)), but not inpatients (N = 5,218). We found seven clusters of severe mental illness: the cluster with the most extreme overrepresentation of bipolar disorder (RR = 5.83, p < 0.001) has an average annual incidence of 8.7 inpatients per 10,000 residents, among the highest frequencies worldwide.Conclusions The hospital database reflects the geographic distribution of severe, but not mild, mental illness within Caldas. Each hotspot is a candidate location for further research to identify genetic or environmental risk factors for severe mental illness. Our analyses highlight how existing infrastructure from middle-income countries can be extraordinary resources for population studies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by R01MH113078 (to CEB, CLJ and NBF), R01MH123157 (to LMOL, CLJ and NBF), R00MH116115 (to LMOL) and R56 AI152759 (to SB).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at CSJDM and UCLAI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNA