RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Calcium Channel Blockers: clinical outcome associations with reported pharmacogenetics variants in 32,000 patients
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.03.23.22272805
DO 10.1101/2022.03.23.22272805
A1 Türkmen, Deniz
A1 Masoli, Jane A.H.
A1 Delgado, João
A1 Kuo, Chia-Ling
A1 Bowden, Jack
A1 Melzer, David
A1 Pilling, Luke C.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/23/2022.03.23.22272805.abstract
AB Background Dihydropiridine calcium channel blockers (dCCB) (e.g. amlodipine) are widely used for treating hypertension. Pharmacogenetic variants impact treatment efficacy, yet evidence on clinical outcomes in routine primary care is limited. We aimed to estimate associations between reported pharmacogenetic variants and incident adverse events in a community-based cohort prescribed dCCB, including in high-risk subgroups.Methods We analysed up to 32,360 UK Biobank European-ancestry participants prescribed dCCB in primary care electronic health records (from UK General Practices, 1990 to 2017). We investigated 23 genetic variants in 16 genes reported in PharmGKB, including CYP3A5 and RYR3. Outcomes were incident diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), edema, and switching antihypertensive medication. Secondary analysis in patients with history of heart disease was also performed.Results Participants were aged 40 to 79 years at first dihydropyridine prescription (treatment duration 1 month to 40 years, mean 5.9 years). Carriers of rs877087 T allele in the ryanodine receptor 3 (RYR3) had increased risk of HF (Hazard Ratio 1.13: 95% Confidence Intervals 1.02 to 1.25, p=0.02). We estimated that if rs877087 T allele carriers were prescribed an alternative treatment the incidence of HF in patients prescribed dCCB would reduce by 9.2% (95%CI 3.1 to 15.4). In patients with a history of heart disease when first prescribed dCCB (N=2,296), RYR3 rs877087 homozygotes had increased risk of new CHD or HF compared to CC variant (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.44, p=0.002). Two variants increased likelihood of switching to an alternate antihypertensive medication (rs10898815 in gene NUMA1 HR 1.16: 95%CI 1.07 to 1,27, p=0.0009; rs776746 in CYP3A5 HR 1.59: 95%CI 1.09 to 2.32, p=0.02). rs776746 in CYP3A5 also increased CKD risk (HR 2.12, p=0.002). The remaining previously reported variants were not strongly or consistently associated with the studied clinical outcomes.Conclusions In this large primary care cohort, patients with common genetic variants in NUMA1, CYP3A5 and RYR3 had increased adverse clinical outcomes. Work is needed to establish whether outcomes of dCCB prescribing could be improved by prior knowledge of such pharmacogenetics variants supported by clinical evidence of association with adverse events.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee approved the collection and use of UK Biobank data (Research Ethics Committee reference 11/NW/0382). Approval was received to use the data in the present work under UK Biobank application #14631 (PI: Prof David Melzer).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript