RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Do recent family physician graduates practice differently? A longitudinal study of primary care visits and continuity in four Canadian provinces
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.03.11.22272161
DO 10.1101/2022.03.11.22272161
A1 Rudoler, David
A1 Peterson, Sandra
A1 Stock, David
A1 Taylor, Carole
A1 Wilton, Drew
A1 Blackie, Doug
A1 Burge, Fred
A1 Glazier, Rick
A1 Goldsmith, Laurie
A1 Grudniewicz, Agnes
A1 Hedden, Lindsay
A1 Jamieson, Margaret
A1 Katz, Alan
A1 MacKenzie, Adrian
A1 Marshall, Emily
A1 McCracken, Rita
A1 McGrail, Kim
A1 Scott, Ian
A1 Wong, Sabrina
A1 Lavergne, M. Ruth
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/22/2022.03.11.22272161.abstract
AB Background Complaints about lack of access to family physicians (FPs) has led to concerns about the role recent physician graduates have had in changes in the supply of primary care services in Canada. This study investigates the impact of career stage, time period, and graduation cohort on family physician practice volume and continuity over two decades.Methods Retrospective-cohort study of family physician practice from 1997/98 to 2017/18. Administrative health and physician claims data were collected in British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. The study included all physicians registered with their respective provincial regulatory colleges with a medical specialty of family practice and/or billed the provincial health insurance system for patient care as family physicians. Median polish analysis of patient contacts and physician-level continuity was completed to isolate years-in-practice, period, and cohort effects.Results Median patient contacts per provider fell over time in the four provinces examined. In all four provinces, median contacts increased with years in practice until mid-to-late-career and declined into end-of-career. We found no relationship between graduation cohort and practice volume or FP-level continuity.Interpretation Recent cohorts of family physicians practice similarly to predecessors in terms of practice volumes and continuity of care. Since FPs of all career stages show declining patient contacts, system-wide solutions to recent challenges in the accessibility of primary care in Canada are needed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030477 Funding StatementThis study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Ministry of Long-Term Care (MLTC). This study also received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR- Project Grant 155965).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UBC-SFU Harmonized Behavioural Research Ethics Board, University of Ottawa Ethics Board, Ontario Tech University Ethics Board, Nova Scotia Health Authority Ethics Board, and the University of Manitoba Ethics Board gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets from this study is are held securely in coded form at the data centres in each province. While legal data sharing agreements between these data centres and data providers (e.g., healthcare organizations and government) prohibit the data centres from making the dataset publicly available, access may be granted to those who meet pre-specified criteria for confidential access. For instance, for Ontario data these details concerning access are available at www.ices.on.ca/DAS (email: das@ices.on.ca). The full dataset creation plan and underlying analytic code are available from the authors upon request, understanding that the computer programs may rely upon coding templates or macros that are unique to the data centres where the analytic datasets were generated and are therefore either inaccessible or may require modification.