PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kurdi, Amanj
AU  - Weir, Natalie
AU  - Mueller, Tanja
TI  - An umbrella review and meta-analysis of the use of renin-angiotensin system drugs and COVID-19 outcomes: what do we know so far?
AID  - 10.1101/2022.03.20.22272664
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.03.20.22272664
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/21/2022.03.20.22272664.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/21/2022.03.20.22272664.full
AB  - Backgrounds Evidence from several meta-analyses are still controversial about the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID-19 outcomes.Purpose Umbrella review of systematic reviews/meta-analysis to provide comprehensive assessment of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19 related outcomes by summarising the currently available evidence.Data Source Medline (OVID), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library and medRxiv from inception to 1st February 2021.Study Selection Systematic reviews with meta-analysis that evaluated the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19 related clinical outcomesData Extraction Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed studies’ risk of bias using AMSTAR 2 Critical Appraisal Tool.Data Synthesis Pooled estimates were combined using the random-effects meta-analyses model including several sub-group analyses. Overall, 47 reviews were eligible for inclusion. Out of the nine COVID-19 outcomes evaluated, there was significant associations between ACEIs/ARBs use and each of death (OR=0.80, 95%CI=0.75-0.86; I2=51.9%), death/ICU admission as composite outcome (OR=0.86, 95%CI=0.80-0.92; I2=43.9%), severe COVID-19 (OR=0.86, 95%CI=0.78-0.95; I2=68%), and hospitalisation (OR=1.23, 95%CI=1.04-1.46; I2= 76.4%). The significant reduction in death/ICU admission, however, was higher among studies which presented adjusted measure of effects (OR=0.63, 95%CI=0.47-0.84) and were of moderate quality (OR=0.74, 95%CI=0.63-0.85).Limitations The effect of unmeasured confounding could not be ruled out. Only 21.3% (n=10) of the studies were of ‘moderate’ quality.Conclusion Collective evidence from observational studies indicate a good quality evidence on the significant association between ACEIs/ARBs use and reduction in death and death/ICU admission, but poor-quality evidence on both reducing severe COVID-19 and increasing hospitalisation. Our findings further support the current recommendations of not discontinuing ACEIs/ARBs therapy in patients with COVID-19.Registration The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021233398).Funding Source NoneCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors