RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A SARS-CoV-2 negative antigen rapid diagnostic in RT-qPCR positive samples correlates with a low likelihood of infectious viruses in the nasopharynx
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.03.17.22272008
DO 10.1101/2022.03.17.22272008
A1 Corrêa, Isadora Alonso
A1 Faffe, Débora Souza
A1 Galliez, Rafael Mello
A1 Gonçalves, Cássia Cristina Alves
A1 Araújo Maia, Richard
A1 da Silva, Gustavo Peixoto
A1 Rebello Moreira, Filipe Romero
A1 Mariani, Diana
A1 Campos, Mariana Freire
A1 de Carvalho Leitão, Isabela
A1 de Souza, Marcos Romário
A1 Cunha, Marcela Sabino
A1 dos Santos Nascimento, Érica Ramos
A1 de Jesus Ribeiro, Liane
A1 da Cruz, Thais Felix Cordeiro
A1 Policarpo, Cintia
A1 Gonzales, Luis
A1 Rodgers, Mary A
A1 Berg, Michael
A1 Vijesurier, Roy
A1 Cloherty, Gavin A
A1 Hackett, John
A1 da Costa Ferreira, Orlando
A1 Castiñeiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto
A1 Tanuri, Amilcar
A1 da Costa, Luciana Jesus
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/20/2022.03.17.22272008.abstract
AB SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs even among fully vaccinated individuals; thus, prompt identification of infected patients is central to control viral circulation. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) are highly specific, but sensitivity is variable.Discordant RT-qPCR vs Ag-RDT results are reported, raising the question of whether negative Ag-RDT in positive RT-qPCR samples could imply the absence of infectious viruses. To study the relationship between a negative Ag-RDT results with virological, molecular, and serological parameters, we selected a cross sectional and a follow-up dataset and analyzed virus culture, subgenomic RNA quantification, and sequencing to determine infectious viruses and mutations. We demonstrated that a positive SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT result correlates with the presence of infectious virus in nasopharyngeal samples. A decrease in sgRNA detection together with an expected increase in detectable anti-S and anti-N IgGs was verified in negative Ag-RDT / positive RT-qPCR samples. The data clearly demonstrates the less likelihood of a negative Ag-RDT sample to harbor infectious SARS-CoV-2 and consequently with a lower transmissible potential.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCNPq; CAPES; Instituto Serrapilheira; UFRJ; Abbott.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The present study was approved by the local ethics review committee from Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital (CAAE: 30161620.0.0000.5257) and by the national ethical review board (CAAE: 30127020.0.0000.0068).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.