PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gomez, Katalin Ujhelyi
AU  - Corcoran, Rhiannon
AU  - Ring, Adele
AU  - Hassan, Shaima
AU  - Abba, Katherine
AU  - Downing, Jennifer
AU  - Goodall, Mark
AU  - Gabbay, Mark
AU  - Clarke, Pam
AU  - Moran, Paul
AU  - Obe, Dorcas Akeju
AU  - Bennett, Kate M
TI  - Characteristics of mental health stability during COVID-19: An online survey with people residing in the Liverpool City Region
AID  - 10.1101/2022.03.17.22272479
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.03.17.22272479
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/18/2022.03.17.22272479.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/18/2022.03.17.22272479.full
AB  - Background and aim Despite the significant mental health challenges the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated government measures have presented, research have shown that the majority of people have adapted and coped well. The aim of this study was i) to determine the proportion of people with mental stability and volatility during the pandemic in a North West urban environment sample and ii) to establish group differences in psychosocial variables. Mental stability and volatility refer to the extent to which individuals reported change in levels of common mental health symptoms over the course of 12 weeks.Method a two-wave-online survey (N = 163) was used to explore the psychological and social impact of the pandemic on relatively disadvantaged neighbourhoods within the Liverpool City Region over 12 weeks. Kruskal-Wallis with post-hoc tests were used to determine how people with mental stability and volatility differed on factors categorised within an ecological framework of resilience (individual, community, societal, and COVID-19 specific).Results Individuals categorised as ‘stable’ in terms of mental health symptoms (63.6%) had better mental and physical health; were more tolerant of uncertainty; reported higher levels of resilience and wellbeing compared to ‘very volatile’ people (19.8%). These individuals also reported feeling less socially isolated, experienced a greater sense of belonging to their community which was more likely to fulfil their needs, and were more likely to have access to green space nearby for their recommended daily exercise. ‘Stable’ individuals did not report worrying any more during the pandemic than usual and tolerated uncertainty better compared to those in the ‘volatile’ group.Implications The majority of participants in this sample were mentally stable and coping well with the challenges presented by the pandemic. The resilience of these individuals was related to key place-based factors such as a strong sense of community and useable local assets. The data showcase the role of place-based social determinants in supporting resilience and thereby highlight key preventative measures for public mental health during times of international crisis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementKMB and RC received funding. No grant number available. University of Liverpool - COVID-19 Strategic Research Fund. https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/coronavirus/research-and-analysis/covid-19-research-projects/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was granted by the University of Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (7739).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data file used for the analyses is available from the Open Science Framework database: https://osf.io/6pwdj/ https://osf.io/6pwdj/