PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Lapointe-Shaw, Lauren
AU  - Salahub, Christine
AU  - Bhatia, R. Sacha
AU  - Desveaux, Laura
AU  - Glazier, Richard H.
AU  - Hedden, Lindsay
AU  - Ivers, Noah M.
AU  - Martin, Danielle
AU  - Spithoff, Sheryl
AU  - Na, Yingbo
AU  - Tadrous, Mina
AU  - Kiran, Tara
TI  - Characteristics and healthcare use of patients attending virtual walk-in clinics: a cross-sectional analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2022.02.28.22271640
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.02.28.22271640
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/01/2022.02.28.22271640.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/01/2022.02.28.22271640.full
AB  - Importance Virtual walk-in clinics have proliferated since the onset of COVID-19. Yet, little is known about those who participate in this care model, and how virtual walk-in clinics contribute to care continuity and patient healthcare utilization.Objectives To describe the characteristics and healthcare use of patients using virtual walk-in clinics compared to the general population, and a subset that received any virtual family physician visit.Design This was a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional study.Setting Ontario, Canada’s most populous province.Participants Patients who had received at least one family physician visit at one of 13 virtual walk-in clinics from April 1st to December 31st, 2020. They were compared to Ontario residents who had any virtual family physician visit in the same time period.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Patient characteristics and 30-day post-visit healthcare utilization.Results Virtual walk-in patients (N=132,168) had fewer comorbidities and lower previous healthcare utilization than Ontarians with any virtual visit. Less than 0.1% of virtual walk-in visits were with a patient’s own family physician. Compared to Ontarians having any virtual family physician visit, virtual walk-in patients were significantly less likely to have a subsequent in-person visit with the same physician (0.2% vs. 11.0%, SMD = 0.48), more likely to have a subsequent virtual visit (30.3% vs. 21.9%, SMD = 0.19), and twice as likely to have an emergency department visit within 30 days (8.3% vs. 4.1%, SMD = 0.18), an effect that persisted after adjustment and across rurality groups: large urban (aOR 2.26; 95% CI 2.08-2.45), small urban (aOR 2.08; 95% CI 1.99-2.18), and rural (aOR 1.87; 95% CI 1.69-2.07).Conclusions and Relevance Compared to Ontarians attending any family physician virtual visit, virtual walk-in patients were less likely to have a subsequent in-person physician visit, but were more likely to visit the emergency department. Low continuity and the lack of physical examination may be contributing to increased emergency department utilization for virtual walk-in clinic patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) project grant (#175285).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe dataset from this study is held securely in coded form at ICES. While legal data sharing agreements between ICES and data providers (e.g., healthcare organizations and government) prohibit ICES from making the dataset publicly available, access may be granted to those who meet pre-specified criteria for confidential access, available at www.ices.on.ca/DAS (email: das@ices.on.ca). The full dataset creation plan and underlying analytic code are available from the authors upon request, understanding that the computer programs may rely upon coding templates or macros that are unique to ICES and are therefore either inaccessible or may require modification