RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Mental and social wellbeing and the UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: evidence from nine longitudinal studies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.11.15.21266264
DO 10.1101/2021.11.15.21266264
A1 Wels, Jacques
A1 Booth, Charlotte
A1 Wielgoszewska, Bożena
A1 Green, Michael
A1 Di Gessa, Giorgio
A1 Huggins, Charlotte F.
A1 Griffith, Gareth J.
A1 Kwong, Alex S. F.
A1 Bowyer, Ruth C. E.
A1 Maddock, Jane
A1 Patalay, Praveetha
A1 Silverwood, Richard J.
A1 Fitzsimons, Emla
A1 Shaw, Richard
A1 Thompson, Ellen J.
A1 Steptoe, Andrew
A1 Hughes, Alun
A1 Chaturvedi, Nishi
A1 Steves, Claire J.
A1 Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
A1 Ploubidis, George B.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/28/2021.11.15.21266264.abstract
AB Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to major economic disruptions. In March 2020, the UK implemented the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – known as furlough – to minimize the impact of job losses. We investigate associations between change in employment status and mental and social wellbeing during the early stages of the pandemic.Methods Data were from 25,670 respondents, aged 17 to 66, across nine UK longitudinal studies. Furlough and other employment changes were defined using employment status pre-pandemic and during the first lockdown (April-June 2020). Mental and social wellbeing outcomes included psychological distress, life satisfaction, self-rated health, social contact, and loneliness. Study-specific modified Poisson regression estimates, adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pandemic mental and social wellbeing measures, were pooled using meta-analysis.Results Compared to those who remained working, furloughed workers were at greater risk of psychological distress (adjusted risk ratio, ARR=1.12; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.29), low life satisfaction (ARR=1.14; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.22), loneliness (ARR=1.12; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.23), and poor self-rated health (ARR=1.26; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.50), but excess risk was less pronounced than that of those no longer employed (e.g., ARR for psychological distress=1.39; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.59) or in stable unemployment (ARR=1.33; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.62).Conclusions During the early stages of the pandemic, those furloughed had increased risk for poor mental and social wellbeing. However, their excess risk was lower in magnitude than that of those who became or remained unemployed, suggesting that furlough may have partly mitigated poorer outcomes.Competing Interest StatementNo conflicts of interest were declared by the authors, except Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi who is a member of the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Core Studies, an initiative funded by UKRI, NIHR and the Health and Safety Executive. The COVID-19 Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing National Core Study was funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_PC_20030).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All datasets included in this analysis have established data sharing processes, and for most included studies the anonymised datasets with corresponding documentation can be downloaded for use by researchers from the UK Data Service. We have detailed the processes for each dataset in Supplementary File 1.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll datasets included in this analysis have established data sharing processes, and for most included studies the anonymised datasets with corresponding documentation can be downloaded for use by researchers from the UK Data Service. All datasets included in this analysis have established data sharing processes, and for most included studies the anonymised datasets with corresponding documentation can be downloaded for use by researchers from the UK Data Service. We have detailed the processes for each dataset in Supplementary File 1. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/ ARRAdjusted Risk RatioALSPAC-G1Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and ChildrenALSPAC-G0Parents of ALSPAC-G1.BCS701970 British Cohort StudyCIConfidence intervalCJRSCoronavirus Job Retention SchemeELSAEnglish Longitudinal Study of AgeingGSGeneration Scotland: the Scottish Family Health StudyMCSMillennium Cohort StudyNCDS1958 National Child Development StudyNSNext Steps (formerly the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England)UKUnited KingdomUSOCUnderstanding Society