RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy: a Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) Network study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.02.22.22271358
DO 10.1101/2022.02.22.22271358
A1 Sadarangani, Manish
A1 Soe, Phyumar
A1 Shulha, Hennady
A1 Valiquette, Louis
A1 Vanderkooi, Otto G
A1 Kellner, James D
A1 Muller, Matthew P
A1 Top, Karina A
A1 Isenor, Jennifer E
A1 McGeer, Allison
A1 Irvine, Mike
A1 De Serres, Gaston
A1 Marty, Kimberly
A1 Bettinger, Julie A.
A1 Canadian Immunization Research Network
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/24/2022.02.22.22271358.abstract
AB Background Pregnant individuals have been receiving COVID-19 vaccines following pre-authorization clinical trials in non-pregnant people. This study aimed to determine significant health events amongst pregnant females after COVID-19 vaccination, compared with unvaccinated pregnant controls and vaccinated non-pregnant individuals.Methods Study participants were pregnant and non-pregnant females aged 15-49 years who had received any COVID-19 vaccine, and pregnant unvaccinated controls. Participants reported significant health events occurring within seven days of vaccination. We employed multivariable logistic regression to examine significant health events associated with mRNA vaccines.Findings Overall 226/5,597(4.0%) vaccinated pregnant females reported a significant health event after dose one of an mRNA vaccine, and 227/3,108(7.3%) after dose two, compared with 11/339(3.2%) pregnant unvaccinated females. Pregnant vaccinated females had an increased odds of a significant health event after dose two of mRNA-1273 (aOR 4.4,95%CI 2.4-8.3) compared to pregnant unvaccinated controls, but not after dose one of mRNA-1273 or any dose of BNT162b2. Pregnant females had decreased odds of a significant health event compared to non-pregnant females after both dose one (aOR 0.63,95%CI 0.55-0.72) and dose two (aOR 0.62,95%CI 0.54-0.71) of mRNA vaccination. There were no significant differences in any analyses when restricted to events which led to medical attention.Interpretation COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have a good safety profile in pregnancy. Rates of significant health events were higher after dose two of mRNA-1273 compared with unvaccinated controls, with no difference when considering events leading to medical consultation. Rates of significant health events were lower in pregnant females than similarly aged non-pregnant individuals.Funding This work was supported by the COVID-19 Vaccine Readiness funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Public Health Agency of Canada CANVAS grant number CVV-450980 and by funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada, through the Vaccine Surveillance Reference Group and the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force.Competing Interest StatementMS has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo and VBI Vaccines. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. OGV has been an investigator, coinvestigator and/or expert panelist on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, and Seqirus, outside the submitted work. JDK has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, and Pfizer. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. KAT has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline. All funds have been paid to her institute, and she has not received any personal payments. JEI has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi-Pasteur. All funds have been paid to her institute, and she has not received any personal payments. AJM has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, and Seqirus, with funds paid to her institution, and has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards from Astra-Zeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Medicago, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, and for presentations from Astra-Zeneca, and Moderna. GDS has been an investigator on a project funded by Pfizer. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. Other authors have no disclosures.Clinical Protocols https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/1/e051254 Funding StatementThis work was supported by the COVID-19 Vaccine Readiness funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Public Health Agency of Canada CANVAS grant number CVV-450980 and by funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada, through the Vaccine Surveillance Reference Group and the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All participants provided informed consent electronically. Each study site has Research Ethics Board approvals for the project (UBC Children's & Women's, CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS, Health PEI, Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, IWK Health, Unity Health Toronto, and CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified data collected for the study (with data dictionary) may be made available upon approval by the study investigators, with relevant agreements (e.g., data sharing agreement) and approvals (e.g., relevant ethics approvals). Requests should be directed to the corresponding author in the first instance.