PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Khan, Amish M.
AU  - Lee, Jake
AU  - Rammaha, Thue
AU  - Gupta, Shruti
AU  - Smith, Harrison
AU  - Kannampallil, Thomas
AU  - Farrell, Nyssa
AU  - Kallogjeri, Dorina
AU  - Piccirillo, Jay F.
TI  - Natural Trajectory of Recovery of COVID-19 Associated Olfactory Loss
AID  - 10.1101/2022.02.17.22270551
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.02.17.22270551
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/17/2022.02.17.22270551.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/17/2022.02.17.22270551.full
AB  - Importance Prevalence of post-viral olfactory loss has increased dramatically due to the frequency and severity of olfactory dysfunction associated with infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Objective To determine the trajectory of COVID-19 olfactory loss over a six-month period. A key secondary objective is to assess predictive factors associated with the recovery of olfaction.Design Longitudinal repeated-measures study that enrolled from May 5, 2020 to February 2, 2021, with the last date of data collection on June 15, 2021.Setting Barnes-Jewish HealthCare/Washington University School of Medicine facilities (Saint Louis, Missouri, USA).Participants Individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal swab and indicated olfactory loss on COVID-19 screening questionnaire. Individuals were excluded if they had previously diagnosed history of olfactory loss, neurodegenerative disorders, less than 18 years of age, admitted to hospital service, unable to read, write, and understand English, or lacked computer or internet access.Interventions/Exposures Watch and wait for spontaneous recovery.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Participants completed olfactory assessments every 30 days for six months. Each assessment consisted of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), an objective “scratch-and-sniff” test, and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), a subjective Likert rating scale.Results The mean age was 41 years old (SD = 16). 39 (80%) were female and 42 (86%) white. At baseline assessment of objective olfaction, 18 (36%) participants had anosmia or severe hyposmia. Subjective, complete recovery at six months was 81% (95% CI 74% to 88%). Likelihood of recovery was associated with age less than 50 years (aHR = 8.1 (95% CI 1.1 to 64.1)) and mild olfactory loss at baseline (UPSIT = 30-33 for males and 31-34 for females) (aHR 6.2 (95% CI 1.2 to 33.0)).Conclusions and Relevance The trajectory of olfactory recovery among adults with COVID-19 olfactory loss illustrated rapid recovery within 2-3 weeks of infection, and by six months 81% had recovered based on self-report. Age less than 50 years old and mild severity of olfactory loss at baseline were associated with increased likelihood of recovery of olfaction. These findings can be used to inform shared decision-making with patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Center For Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number TL1TR002344. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Washington University Institutional Review Board (IRB#202004146).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors