RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 CD14 Positive Extracellular Vesicles in Broncho-Alveolar Lavage Fluid as a New Biomarker of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.25.21264053
DO 10.1101/2021.09.25.21264053
A1 Mahida, Rahul Y.
A1 Price, Joshua
A1 Lugg, Sebastian T.
A1 Li, Hui
A1 Parekh, Dhruv
A1 Scott, Aaron
A1 Harrison, Paul
A1 Matthay, Michael A.
A1 Thickett, David R.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/11/2021.09.25.21264053.abstract
AB Recent studies have indicated that extracellular vesicles (EV) may play a role in the pathogenesis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). EV have been identified as potential biomarkers of disease severity and prognosis in other pulmonary diseases. We sought to characterize the EV phenotype within ARDS patient broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BAL), and to determine whether BAL EV could be utilized as a potential biomarker in ARDS. BAL was collected from sepsis patients with and without ARDS, and from esophagectomy patients post-operatively (of whom a subset later developed ARDS during hospital admission). BAL EV were characterized with regards to size, number and cell of origin. Sepsis patients with ARDS had significantly higher numbers of CD14+/CD81+ monocyte-derived BAL EV than sepsis patients without ARDS (p=0.015). However, the converse was observed in esophagectomy patients who later developed ARDS (p=0.003). Esophagectomy patients who developed ARDS also had elevated CD31+/CD63+ and CD31+/CD81+ endothelial-derived BAL EV (p≤0.02) compared to esophagectomy patients who did not develop ARDS. Further studies are required to determine whether CD31+ BAL EV may be a predictive biomarker for ARDS in esophagectomy patients. CD14+/CD81+ BAL EV numbers were significantly higher in those patients with sepsis-related ARDS who died during the 30 days following ICU admission (p=0.027). Thus, CD14+/CD81+ BAL EV are a potential biomarker for disease severity and mortality in sepsis-related ARDS. These findings provide the impetus to further elucidate the contribution of these EV to ARDS pathogenesis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by Medical Research Council grants MR/N021185/1 (RYM) and MR/L002736/1 (DT/AS), and by National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute grants HL134828 (MAM) and HL140026 (MAM). The ExoView platform was funded by an EPSRC Capital award awarded to Dr. Sophie Cox, University of Birmingham.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was given by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 1 (reference number 16/WA/0169) to recruit ventilated sepsis patients with and without ARDS. Ethical approval was also given by the South Birmingham (England) Research Ethics Committee (reference number 12/WM/0092) to recruit patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma as previously described in the VINDALOO trial. For patients who lacked capacity, permission to enroll was sought from a personal legal representative in accordance with the UK Mental Capacity Act (2005). For patients with capacity, written informed consent was obtained from the patient.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAnonymised data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.