PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Khan, Ijaz AU - Fatima, Manaal AU - Scholes, Corey AU - Kandhari, Vikram AU - Ponnanna, K.M. AU - Herald, Jonathan TI - Factors affecting first return to work following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective observational study in an occupational medicine clinic and single-surgeon practice AID - 10.1101/2021.09.20.21263877 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.09.20.21263877 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/09/2021.09.20.21263877.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/09/2021.09.20.21263877.full AB - Aims Determine factors affecting first return to work (RTW) status and time in patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR) under state-based compensation schemes in New South Wales, Australia, compared to those outside such schemes.Material and Methods Patients undergoing aRCR by one surgeon with minimum 1-year follow-up were grouped into those under (CP) or outside (non-CP) workers or vehicle accident compensation schemes, matched by age and gender. RTW status and time were assessed using chi-square analysis and multivariable linear regression.Results Of 1054 available patients, 90 CP patients were identified with 29 consented and matched to non-CP (N=29). A higher proportion of CP patients (17.2 vs 0%, P<0.001) never returned to work and a lower proportion resumed pre-injury duties at first RTW (3 vs 52%, P<0.01). Median time to first RTW did not differ between CP and non-CP groups (5.1 vs 4.4, P=0.86). Smoking (P=0.007) and post-injury activity level (P=0.004) were significantly associated with longer time to first RTW, whereas compensation status was not.Conclusions CP patients undergoing aRCR in NSW are at risk of not returning to work. For those that do return, there is no significant difference compared to non-CP in time to first RTW. Particularly, patient and management factors associated with extended time to first RTW have been identified. Interventions aimed at modifiable factors such as smoking cessation and increasing preoperative activity may improve future outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the first author IK and received no external funding. MF and CS are employees of EBM Analytics, and EBM Analytics was contracted by IK to assist with the study design, conduct and manuscript preparation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Bellberry Limited (HREC 2018-07-597-A-1)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData may be made available from the authors on reasonable request.