RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 History of SARS-CoV-2 infection, anti-spike IgG antibody kinetics and neutralization capacities following the second and third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in nursing home residents
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.02.07.22270557
DO 10.1101/2022.02.07.22270557
A1 Jeulin, H.
A1 Labat, C.
A1 Duarte, K.
A1 Toupance, S.
A1 Nadin, G.
A1 Craus, D.
A1 Georgiopoulos, I.
A1 Gantois, I.
A1 Goehringer, F.
A1 Benetos, A.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/08/2022.02.07.22270557.abstract
AB Importance Duration of post-vaccination protection against COVID-19 in individuals is a critical issue, especially in nursing home (NH) residents, i.e. one of the most vulnerable populations.Objective To estimate the duration of the IgG(S) response to the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in NH residents with (COV-Yes) or without (COV-No) history of natural infection with SARS-CoV-2.Design, setting and participants IgG(S) quantification was carried out at 3 different time periods following administration of the Pfizer BioNtech vaccine: three then seven months after the 2nd dose and one month after the 3rd dose. 574 COV-Yes and COV-No NH residents were included in 2 cohorts: Main (n=115, mean age 84 years) or Confirmatory (n=459, mean age 88 years).Exposure All subjects received the BNT162b2 vaccine.Main outcomes and measurements IgG(S) antibodies and seroneutralization capacity.Results Neutralization capacity was strongly correlated with IgG(S) levels (R2:76%) without any difference between COV-Yes and COV-No groups for the same levels of IgG(S). COV-Yes, compared to the COV-No subjects showed 5-fold and 15-fold higher IgG(S) titers 3 and 7 months after the 2nd dose, but less than 2-fold higher IgG(S) after the 3rd dose, due to a more pronounced effect of the 3rd dose in the COV-No group. These results were similar in both cohorts. After the 2nd dose, duration of assumed robust protection (IgG(S) >264 BAU/ml) was 2-fold higher in the COV-Yes vs. COV-No group: 12.60 (10.69-14.44) vs 5.76 (3.91-8.64) months, and this advantage was mainly due to the higher IgG(S) titers after the 2nd dose and secondary to a slower decay over time. After the 3rd dose, duration (months) of robust protection was estimated at 11.87 (9.88-14.87) (COV-Yes) and 8.95 (6.85-11.04) (COV-No).Conclusions and relevance In old subjects living in NH, history of SARS-CoV-2 infection provides a clear advantage in the magnitude and duration of high IgG(S) titers following the 2nd dose. Importantly, the 3rd dose induces a much more pronounced IgG(S) response than the 2nd dose in COV-No subjects, the effect of which should be able to ensure in these subjects a prolonged protection against severe forms of COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study has been supported by the PIA project Lorraine Universite Excellence reference ANR-15-IDEX-04-LUEAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics Committee of the Nancy University Hospital CHRU de Nancy gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors