PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Pfeifer, Lucinéia Orsolin
AU  - Helal, Lucas
AU  - Oliveira, Nórton Luís
AU  - Umpierre, Daniel
TI  - Correlates of functional physical capacity in physically active older adults: a conceptual-framework-based cross-sectional analysis of social determinants of health and clinical parameters
AID  - 10.1101/2022.02.02.22270171
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.02.02.22270171
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/06/2022.02.02.22270171.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/06/2022.02.02.22270171.full
AB  - This study aimed to explore social determinants of health and health/clinical determinants on two outcomes of functional physical capacity. Therefore, a population-based sample of 327 older adults (69±7 years; 83.5% women) underwent demographical and clinical questionnaires, risk factors assessments, six-minute walk testing (walking capacity), and handgrip strength testing. Based on multivariable linear regression models, age (−4.05m; - 5.3 to −2.8), being men (71.40m; 50.5 to 92.3), body mass index (−3.88m; −5.6 to −2.1), and quality of life (18.48m; 6.3 to 30.6) remained as predictive variables for walking capacity (R2=30.8%). In the final model for handgrip strength, age (−0.6% kgf; 0.89 to 0.2) and male sex (65.2% kgf; 55.3 to 75.8) remained as predictive variables. Despite exploratory analyses including contextual factors as potential predictors of walking capacity and handgrip strength, only outcomes at the individual levels were associated, either positively or negatively, with the variations presented by this studied sample of older adults.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/q4r69/ Funding StatementFunding source This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001; National Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS) – FAPERGS/Brasil; National Council on Technology and Scientific Development (CNPq). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (GPPG 2018-0100; CAAE 84093317600005327) and of the Municipal Secretariat of Health (SMS/POA).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at (https://zenodo.org/record/4341443#.X9u61thKhPY; doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4341443). https://zenodo.org/record/4341443#.X9u61thKhPY https://osf.io/q4r69/