RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Anterior Segment Parameters on Optical Coherence Tomography in Healthy Children
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.31.22270054
DO 10.1101/2022.01.31.22270054
A1 Nadeem, Sana
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/02/2022.01.31.22270054.abstract
AB Purpose To assess the anterior segment parameters in healthy children, using high resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).Design Prospective, observational studyMethods 108 eyes of 54 healthy children ≤16 years were included after a thorough eye examination. Significant refractive error (>±5 DS), history of previous glaucoma, ocular pathology, intraocular surgery, trauma or systemic ailments were excluded. The anterior segment analysis was done by Optopol Revo 80® high resolution SD-OCT. Central corneal thickness (CCT), Angle opening distance (AOD), Anterior chamber (AC) angle, Trabecular iris space area (TISA), Trabecular iris angle (TIA), iris thickness at 2 mm, internal AC diameter and lens vault were evaluated.Results Mean age was 11.38±3.18 years with a female predominance; 29 (53.7%). Mean IOP was 13.63±2.90 mmHg, mean axial length was 22.82±0.89 mm, mean spherical equivalent was -0.14±1.28 D, mean CCT was 532.6±46.09mm and mean CDR was 0.31±0.19. The mean internal AC diameter was 11609.15±2354 µm. The nasal AC angle was 53.54±11.82° and significantly wider than the temporal AC angle; 50.37±10.26° [p=0.008]. The nasal AOD500 was 0.9±0.33 mm and not significantly greater than the temporal AOD500, 0.85±0.28 mm [p=0.09]. The nasal AOD750 was 1.21±0.45 mm, significantly greater than the temporal AOD750, 1.06±0.32 mm [p=0.001]. The nasal TIA was 41.75°; not significantly greater than the temporal TIA, 40.24° [p=0.246]. The nasal TISA500 was 0.33±0.15 mm2; not significantly wider than the temporal TISA500, 0.31±0.10 mm2 [p=0.056]. The nasal TISA750 was 0. 59±0.22 mm2; not significantly wider than the temporal TISA750, 0.56±0.21 mm2 [p=0.14]. The nasal iris thickness at 2 mm from pupil was 483.54±129.56 µm; not significantly different from the temporal iris thickness, 505.8±138.85 µm [p=0.08]. The mean lens vault was - 519.58±359µm.Conclusions Our study data depicts the normal anterior segment parameters in healthy children. This will be useful in diagnosing and managing ocular pediatric pathology.Key MessagesAnterior segment OCT is still an emerging technique especially in pediatric eye assessmentAnterior segment evaluation via OCT has not been reported in our pediatric populationOur study describes a detailed assessment of anterior segment in pediatric eyesReporting results of normative data helps in diagnosing ocular pathologyCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:"Permission from the ERC (Ethical review committee) of Foundation University Medical College was taken previously, which is in concordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Parental informed consent was taken prior to evaluation."I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data for this study is available from Open Science Framework with the DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BRS2H and link: https://osf.io/brs2h/?view_only=eb70e5865b6048969a29e61d21dcf7d3 https://osf.io/brs2h/?view_only=eb70e5865b6048969a29e61d21dcf7d3