PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Zeng, Jiaming AU - Gensheimer, Michael F. AU - Rubin, Daniel L. AU - Athey, Susan AU - Shachter, Ross D. TI - Uncovering interpretable potential confounders in electronic medical records AID - 10.1101/2021.02.03.21251034 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.02.03.21251034 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/02/2021.02.03.21251034.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/02/2021.02.03.21251034.full AB - Randomized clinical trials (RCT) are the gold standard for informing treatment decisions. Observational studies are often plagued by selection bias, and expert-selected covariates may insufficiently adjust for confounding. We explore how unstructured clinical text can be used to reduce selection bias and improve medical practice. We develop a framework based on natural language processing to uncover interpretable potential confounders from text. We validate our method by comparing the estimated hazard ratio (HR) with and without the confounders against established RCTs. We apply our method to four cohorts built from localized prostate and lung cancer datasets from the Stanford Cancer Institute and show that our method shifts the HR estimate towards the RCT results. The uncovered terms can also be interpreted by oncologists for clinical insights. We present this proof-of-concept study to enable more credible causal inference using observational data, uncover meaningful insights from clinical text, and inform high-stakes medical decisions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research is funded by the Stanford Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Institute and the Department of Management Science and Engineering.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research is approved by the Stanford Institutional Review Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is not available for sharing.