RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 What factors influence concussion risk in American football? Bayesian analysis of 8 seasons of National Football League data
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.29.22270096
DO 10.1101/2022.01.29.22270096
A1 Smoliga, James M
A1 Binney, Zachary O
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/31/2022.01.29.22270096.abstract
AB Importance Professional American football players are concerned that artificial turf playing surfaces and extended seasons increase health risks, but existing research is limited by weak methodology and limited sample size.Objective To examine how playing surface, time of season, and game temperature relate to concussion risk in the National Football League (NFL).Design Retrospective cohort study of 8 years of NFL regular season games.Setting Database of NFL game data and weekly injury reports.Participants All NFL players who participated in a regular season game from the 2012-2019.Exposures NFL game participation.Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the number of concussions within a game. Bayesian negative binomial regression models were fit to relate how playing surface (artificial turf vs. natural grass), game temperature, and week of the season independently related to concussion risk, and any interactions between these factors.Results 1096 concussions were identified in the 1830 games were included in this study. There was a 98% probability that concussion risk was reduced on grass surface (median Incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.534), 99% probability that concussion risk was lower at higher temperatures (IRR=0.979 for each 1°C), and 91% probability that concussion risk increased with each week of the season (IRR=1.019). There was an 84% probability for a surface x temperature interaction (IRR=1.013) and 74% probability for a surface x week interaction (IRR=1.018). If the model was fitted without interaction terms, the probability of each main effect was >99%.Conclusions and Relevance Concussion risk is increased on artificial turf compared to natural grass, and this is exacerbated in cold weather. Concussion risk is also increased later in the season (regardless of temperature) on both surfaces, but the apparent protective effect of natural grass is diminished in later weeks. The complex interplay between these factors may explain seemingly contradictory findings in the literature and must be accounted for in sports injury epidemiology. These findings suggest that player safety concerns regarding artificial turf and extended playing seasons are warranted and should be considered by the NFL. The risk factors should be explored at non-professional levels, and in other sports.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of eight NFL seasons (2012-13 through 2019-20) of concussion data from the PBS Frontline Concussion Watch26 and Football Outsiders27 injury databases. The Football Outsiders database includes data from all weekly NFL injury reports during this time period, including concussion and non-concussion injuries from weeks 1-16 of the regular season. This concussion dataset was combined with data from the Frontline database, which provided an independently collected list of concussions incurred by an NFL player from 2012-2015. Sources: https://www.footballoutsiders.com/ https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/interactive/concussion-watch/#positions_2015I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study will be available upon acceptance into a peer-review journal.