PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Ladha, Feria A.
AU  - Pettinato, Anthony M.
AU  - Perrin, Adam E.
TI  - Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective
AID  - 10.1101/2022.01.29.22270073
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.01.29.22270073
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/30/2022.01.29.22270073.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/30/2022.01.29.22270073.full
AB  - Background A high proportion of medical school graduates pursue specialties different from those declared at matriculation. While these choices influence the career paths, satisfaction, and potential regret students will experience, they also impact the supply and demand ratio of the shorthanded physician workforce across many specialties. In this study, we investigate how the choice of medical specialty and the factors motivating those choices change between the beginning and end of medical school training.Methods A questionnaire was administered annually from 2017 to 2020 to a cohort of medical students at the University of Connecticut to determine longitudinal preferences regarding residency choice, motivational factors influencing residency choice, future career path, and demographic information.Results The questionnaire respondent totals were as follows: n=76 (Year 1), n=54 (Year 2), n=31 (Year 3), and n=65 (Year 4). Amongst newly matriculated students, 25.0% were interested in primary care, which increased ∼1.4-fold to 35.4% in the final year of medical school. In contrast, 38.2% of matriculated students expressed interest in surgical specialties, which decreased ∼2.5-fold to 15.4% in the final year. Specialty choices in the final year that exhibited the largest absolute change from matriculation were orthopedic surgery (−9.9%), family medicine (+8.1%), radiology (+7.9%), general surgery (−7.2%), and anesthesiology (+6.2%). Newly matriculated students interested in primary care demonstrated no differences in their ranking of motivational factors compared to students interested in surgery, but many of these factors significantly deviated between the two career paths in the final year. Specifically, students interested in surgical specialties were more motivated by the rewards of salary and prestige compared to primary care students, who more highly ranked match confidence and family/location factors.Conclusions We identified how residency choices change from the beginning to the end of medical school, how certain motivational factors change with time, how these results diverge between primary care and surgery specialty choice, and propose a new theory based on risk-reward balance regarding residency choice. Our study promotes awareness of student preferences and may help guide school curricula in developing more student-tailored training approaches. This could foster positive long-term changes regarding career satisfaction and the physician workforce.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was reviewed and approved by the Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB) at UConn Health (IRB number 18-062-3) and all participates were consented for the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with the institutional guidelines and regulations. All the participants provided informed consent to participate in the study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe acquired dataset used and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to participant anonymity but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. IRBInstitutional Review BoardUConn SOMUniversity of Connecticut School of MedicineERASElectronic Residency Application ServiceNRMPNational Resident Matching ProgramAAFPAmerican Academy of Family PhysiciansACSAmerican College of SurgeonsOB/GYNObstetrics and gynecology