RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 User acceptability of saliva and gargle samples for identifying COVID-19 positive high-risk workers
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.28.22270033
DO 10.1101/2022.01.28.22270033
A1 McLennan, Kirsty
A1 Barton, Ellen
A1 Lang, Christie
A1 Adams, Ian R.
A1 McAllister, Gina
A1 Reijns, Martin A. M.
A1 Templeton, Kate
A1 Johannessen, Ingólfur
A1 Leckie, Alastair
A1 Gilbert, Nick
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/30/2022.01.28.22270033.abstract
AB Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic nasopharyngeal or nose/throat swabs (NTS) have been the primary approach for collecting patient samples for the subsequent detection of viral RNA. However, this procedure, if undertaken correctly, can be unpleasant and therefore deters individuals from providing high quality samples. To overcome these limitations other modes of sample collection have been explored. In a cohort of frontline healthcare workers we have compared saliva and gargle samples to gold-standard NTS. 93% of individuals preferred providing saliva or gargle samples, with little sex-dependent variation. Viral titres collected in samples were analysed using standard methods and showed that gargle and saliva were similarly comparable for identifying COVID-19 positive individuals compared to NTS (92% sensitivity; 98% specificity). We suggest that gargle and saliva collection are viable alternatives to NTS swabs and may encourage testing to provide better disease diagnosis and population surveillance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by NHS Lothian and the UK Medical Research CouncilAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NHS Lothian Ethics Panel approved this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript