PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - McLennan, Kirsty
AU  - Barton, Ellen
AU  - Lang, Christie
AU  - Adams, Ian R.
AU  - McAllister, Gina
AU  - Reijns, Martin A. M.
AU  - Templeton, Kate
AU  - Johannessen, Ingólfur
AU  - Leckie, Alastair
AU  - Gilbert, Nick
TI  - User acceptability of saliva and gargle samples for identifying COVID-19 positive high-risk workers
AID  - 10.1101/2022.01.28.22270033
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.01.28.22270033
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/30/2022.01.28.22270033.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/30/2022.01.28.22270033.full
AB  - Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic nasopharyngeal or nose/throat swabs (NTS) have been the primary approach for collecting patient samples for the subsequent detection of viral RNA. However, this procedure, if undertaken correctly, can be unpleasant and therefore deters individuals from providing high quality samples. To overcome these limitations other modes of sample collection have been explored. In a cohort of frontline healthcare workers we have compared saliva and gargle samples to gold-standard NTS. 93% of individuals preferred providing saliva or gargle samples, with little sex-dependent variation. Viral titres collected in samples were analysed using standard methods and showed that gargle and saliva were similarly comparable for identifying COVID-19 positive individuals compared to NTS (92% sensitivity; 98% specificity). We suggest that gargle and saliva collection are viable alternatives to NTS swabs and may encourage testing to provide better disease diagnosis and population surveillance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by NHS Lothian and the UK Medical Research CouncilAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NHS Lothian Ethics Panel approved this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript