RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of the systemic and mucosal immune response induced by COVID-19 and the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine for SARS-CoV-2
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.29.22270066
DO 10.1101/2022.01.29.22270066
A1 Nickel, Olaf
A1 Rockstroh, Alexandra
A1 Wolf, Johannes
A1 Landgraf, Susann
A1 Kalbitz, Sven
A1 Kellner, Nils
A1 Borte, Michael
A1 Fertey, Jasmin
A1 Lübbert, Christoph
A1 Ulbert, Sebastian
A1 Borte, Stephan
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/30/2022.01.29.22270066.abstract
AB Background Currently used vaccines to protect from COVID-19 mostly focus on the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the viral spike protein, and induced neutralizing antibodies have shown to be protective. However, functional relevance of vaccine-generated antibodies are poorly understood on variants-of-concern (VOCs) and mucosal immunity.Methods We compared specific antibody production against the S1 subunit and the RBD of the spike protein, the whole virion of SARS-CoV-2, and monitored neutralizing antibodies in sera and saliva of 104 BNT162b2 vaccinees and 57 individuals with natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, we included a small cohort of 11 individuals which received a heterologous ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 prime-boost vaccination.Results Vaccinated individuals showed higher S1-IgG antibodies in comparison to COVID-19 patients, followed by a significant decrease 3 months later. Neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) were poorly correlated with initial S1-IgG levels, indicating that these might largely be non-neutralizing. In contrast, RBD IgGAM was strongly correlated to nAbs, suggesting that RBD-IgGAM is a surrogate marker to estimate nAb concentrations after vaccination. The protective effect of vaccine- and infection-induced nAbs was found reduced towards B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 VOCs. NAb titers are significantly higher after third vaccination compared to second vaccination. In contrast to COVID-19 patients, no relevant levels of RBD specific antibodies were detected in saliva samples from vaccinees.Conclusions Our data demonstrate that BNT162b2 vaccinated individuals generate relevant neutralizing antibodies, which begin to decrease within three months after immunization and show lower neutralizing potential to VOCs as compared to the original Wuhan virus strain. A third booster vaccination provides a stronger nAb antibody response than the second vaccination. The systemic vaccine does not seem to elicit readily detectable mucosal immunity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNO - The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics committee of the Saxonian medical chamber in Germany approved the study (registry number EK-allg-37/10?1) and informed consent was obtained from all volunteers.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.