RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Lung Perfusion Disturbances Detected with MRI in Non-Hospitalized Post-COVID-19 Individuals with Dyspnea 3 -13 Months after the Acute Disease
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.25.22269717
DO 10.1101/2022.01.25.22269717
A1 Yu, Jimmy
A1 Granberg, Tobias
A1 Shams, Roya
A1 Petersson, Sven
A1 Sköld, Magnus
A1 Nyrén, Sven
A1 Lundberg, Johan
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/25/2022.01.25.22269717.abstract
AB Background Dyspnea is a prevalent symptom in the post-COVID-19 condition, though its mechanisms are largely unknown. Lung perfusion abnormalities have been reported in acute COVID-19 and could be suspected in patients with lingering dyspnea after the acute phase.Objectives To detect pulmonary perfusion disturbances in non-hospitalized post-COVID condition with persistent dyspnea 4-13 months after the disease onset.Methods Non-hospitalized individuals reporting persistent dyspnea after COVID-19 and matched healthy controls were prospectively recruited between October 2020 and May 2021 to undergo pulmonary dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), six-minute walk test, and self-reported scales questionnaires on dyspnea and physical activity. The DCE-MRI perfusion images were quantified into two parametric values: mean time-to-peak (TTP) and TTP ratio.Results Twenty-eight persons with post-COVID condition and persistent dyspnea (mean age 46.5±8.0 years, 75% women) and 22 healthy controls (mean age 44.1±10.8 years, 73% women) were included. The post-COVID group had higher mean pulmonary TTP (0.43±0.04 vs. 0.41±0.03, P=0.011) and higher TTP ratio (0.096±0.052 vs. 0.068±0.027, P=0.032). Notably, post-COVID males had the highest values (mean TTP 0.47±0.02, TTP ratio 0.160±0.039, P<0.001 for both values compared to male controls and post-COVID females). Correlation between dyspnea and perfusion parameters was demonstrated in the males (r=0.83, P<0.001 for mean TTP; r=0.76, P=0.003 for TTP ratio), but not in females.Conclusions Lung perfusion disturbances were detected in males reporting post-COVID dyspnea using perfusion parameters from DCE-MRI. The distinct sex difference has implications for understanding the perplexing post-COVID pathophysiology and warrants future studies. DCE-MRI could provide biomarkers for such studies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by grants from the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (No 20210114) and Karolinska Institutet. JL was supported by MedTechLabs and a private donation by Tedde Jeansson Sr.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Regional Ethics Review Board in Stockholm and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority approved this prospective cross-sectional study performed October 2020 and May 2021 (original approval number 2018/2416-31 with amendments 2020-00047, 2020-02535, 2021-00815). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe anonymized datasets generated and analyzed in the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.